All categories

3 years ago

What is considered deviant in one culture may not be considered deviant in another culture because?

Social Studies

2 answers:

anastassius [24]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

In America, it is extremely common for women, especially in their late teens and twenties, to wear revealing clothing. Things like crop tops and miniskirts can be found at almost every clothing store, and it’s accepted. Although, in Saudi Arabia, it’s illegal for women to show even an inch of bare skin. I don’t think women showing skin should be considered deviant because women should be able to dress however they like.

zloy xaker [14]3 years ago

4 0

What is considered deviant in one culture may not be considered deviant in another culture because each culture has a different set of social norms. A deviance or absence of conformity to these norms can be committed in one society but the particular norm maybe normal for another society.

You might be interested in

Which propaganda technique is being used when a political candidate says he stands for "peace, prosperity, and progress"? plain

atroni [7]

3) Glittering Generalities

Glittering Generalities is a propaganda technique that uses words that are vague, abstract and ambiguous but attractive at the same time as they are associated with valued belief, ideal or concepts that usually trigger powerful emotions in people, and are acclaim by many.

Theses words are usually accepted and acclaim by many, without the need of much examination or explanation of the concept. Use linguistic patterns such as alliteration, metaphor, and reversals that turn your words into poetry that flows and rhymes in hypnotic patterns.

"Peace, prosperity, and progress" is a great example of this propaganda, as it expresses high ideals that tend to appeal to people's emotions, although it doesn't provide any specific concept of what they actually mean or reason that supports the phrase.

Others examples of glittering generalities are "freedom", "honor", "hope", "common good", "democracy", "strength", "dignity", and "love".

4 0

3 years ago

[IMAGE ATTACHED] Help me with the last box please

Rashid [163]

Awnser: Kings, Priests, and Nobles.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is there a connection between territorial expansion and human sacrifices?

patriot [66]

Territorial expansion remained popular with the U.S. public, as did the idea of spreading republican government. Many pro-slavery Southerners sought to expand southwards, allowing for more territory where slavery could continue to grow and expand.

Human Sacrifices is the act of killing one or more humans, usually as an offering to a deity, as part of a ritual. Human sacrifice has been practiced in various cultures throughout history.

I mean.

They're both in history and ''practiced''.

Though a connection, no, Territorial expansion went along with slavery. The act of killing another human being is not very humane nor a connection. Slavery deals with principles of property law are applied to them, allowing individuals to own, buy and sell other individuals, as a de jure form of property. A slave is unable to withdraw unilaterally from such an arrangement and works without remuneration. Human Sacrifices deal with people who have really no choice and are dead either way, victims were typically ritually killed in a manner that was supposed to please or appease gods, spirits or the deceased. Slavery doesn't deal with death. So, no.

6 0

3 years ago

Where are glands located?

nlexa [21]

Neck, under ur arm, chest, belly, and groin

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can a student, who is a LTC holder, be kept out of a classroom on the grounds that the students presence and his/her concealed h

irina [24]

Answer:

No,

Explanation:

In united States, the right to bear fire arms is protected under the 2nd amendment of the constitution.

The only situation where a person can legally be thrown out from a certain social setting is if that person is directly disrupt the activity in that group with the weapon.

From the passage above, the student who held the concealed weapon does not seems to actively do something that disrupt others. This make the class does not have any legal / solid ground to kept that student out.

6 0

3 years ago