1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GaryK [48]
3 years ago
7

3. There are 124 acorns laying on the ground in your yard, it is predicted that the number of acorns will

Mathematics
1 answer:
Gennadij [26K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

507,409

Step-by-step explanation:

if every 5 days the number quadruples (x4), and we want to know how many acorns fall after 30 days, we can divide 30 by 5 so we only have to calculate for the amount of time the take to quadruple.

30 ÷ 5 = 6

so we only have to quadruple the acorns 6 times.

if we start off with 124 acorns, this is what it will look like:

Day 0: 124 acorns

Day 5: 124 x 4 = 496 acorns

Day 10: 496 x 4 = 1984 acorns

Day 15: 1984 x 4 = 7936 acorns

etc... until day 30.

Day 30: 507904 acorns

I hope this was helpful :-)

You might be interested in
Which definition best describes vertical angles?
Artyom0805 [142]

Answer:

B is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Vertical angles are pair angles formed when two lines intersect. Vertical angles are sometimes referred to as vertically opposite angles because the angles are opposite to each other

4 0
3 years ago
The number of events is 29​, the number of trials is 298​, the claimed population proportion is​ 0.10, and the significance leve
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.0973 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{298}}}=-0.155  

p_v =2*P(Z  

And we can use excel to find the p value like this: "=2*NORM.DIST(-0.155;0;1;TRUE)"

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of interest is not significantly different from 0.1 .  

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=298 represent the random sample taken

X=29 represent the events claimed

\hat p=\frac{29}{298}=0.0973 estimated proportion

p_o=0.1 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the proportion is 0.1 or no.:  

Null hypothesis:p=0.1  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.1  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

3) Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.0973 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{298}}}=-0.155  

4) Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z  

And we can use excel to find the p value like this: "=2*NORM.DIST(-0.155;0;1;TRUE)"

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of interest is not significantly different from 0.1 .  

We can do the test also in R with the following code:

> prop.test(29,298,p=0.1,alternative = c("two.sided"),conf.level = 1-0.05,correct = FALSE)

7 0
3 years ago
WILL GIVE BRANILEST ASAP Rocky simplified an expression in three steps, as shown:
Elenna [48]
<span>Step 1, all the exponents are increased by 2 since when squaring a number you have to multiply it to the exponents </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Nevermind yfgeruwijdksfgheywu
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

The solution will be negative.

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not quite sure what sort of answer you're looking for though.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the equation of the line? (Linear Equations and Slope - Quiz I-ready)
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

THE BOTTOM ONE

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Would you just subtract the numerators like normal? Like 7-5 the answer would be 2/9
    8·1 answer
  • This graph shows which inequality?<br>**one is the graph and the other are answers*
    6·2 answers
  • If a 40 foot telephone pole casts a 34 foot shadow at the same time that a nearby tree casts a 28 foot shadow, how tall is the t
    8·1 answer
  • What fractional part of a week is 63 hours
    6·1 answer
  • A study found that, in 2005, 12.5% of U.S. workers belonged to unions (The Wall Street Journal, January 21, 2006). Suppose a sam
    14·1 answer
  • Find y if y = -7x -6 and x=5
    10·2 answers
  • I need help quickly with these problems please see the images thank you so much
    7·1 answer
  • The square ABCD has side length 20 cm,
    15·1 answer
  • An airplane flies at a constant speed of 760 miles per hour. How long will it take to travel a distance of 3040 miles?
    7·1 answer
  • What Ratio Matches the chart
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!