Prove that <br><br> somone help me please

Natali [406]

I’m pretty sure this is correct.

8 0

3 years ago

Student made five tetrahedrons, a three dimensional figure with four triangular faces and labeled the faces 1-4. use an equation

JulsSmile [24]

The probability is 1/1024.

Each tetrahedron has a 1/4 chance of landing on 3, since there are 4 sides and only one of them is marked 3.

Each tetrahedron roll is independent, since no roll is affected by another.

This means we multiply the probabilities:
1/4(1/4)(1/4)(1/4)(1/4) = 1/1024

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please Help.<br> Match the reasons to the statements given.

marishachu [46]

Answer:

1. Given

2. Diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other.

3. Vertical angles are equal.

4. Definition of parallelogram.

5. If lines parallel, then alternate interior angles are equal.

6. ASA

7. CPCTE

Step-by-step explanation:

Statement 1:

The first statement is a parallelogram ABCD, which is already given in the question. So, reason 1 is: Given.

Statement 2:

BT and TD are equal because for a parallelogram, its diagonal bisect each other. Here, BD and AC are the diagonals of parallelogram ABCD. So, the diagonals bisect each other at T. Hence, $BT = TD$

Statement 3:

Angles 1 and 2 is a pair of vertical angles. A pair of vertical angles are always equal to each other.

Statement 4:

A parallelogram is a quadrilateral whose opposite sides are parallel and equal. Hence, $BC ||AD$ is because of the definition of a parallelogram.

Statement 5:

Angles 3 and 4 is a pair of alternate interior angles. If two lines are parallel, then the alternate interior angles are always equal.

Statement 6:

The triangles BET and DFT are now congruent because:

i.Angle- $\angle1=\angle2$

ii. Side - $BT = TD$

iii. Angle - $\angle3=\angle4$

Therefore, by ASA postulate the two triangles are congruent.

Statement 7:

As the two triangles are congruent, then their corresponding parts are also equal.

So, by CPCTE, $ET=FT$

5 0

3 years ago

Which expression uses the associative property to make it easier to evaluate 14(3/2 x 1/4)

Sav [38]

Answer:

Not sure but the answer to 14(3/2 x 1/4) is 5.25

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Maurice made a model of the steel tabletop his model measures 7 inches by 13 inches is the model simular to the original

Levart [38]

The first example has students building upon the previous lesson by applying the scale factor to find missing dimensions. This leads into a discussion of whether this method is the most efficient and whether they could find another approach that would be simpler, as demonstrated in Example 2. Guide students to record responses and additional work in their student materials.
§ How can we use the scale factor to write an equation relating the scale drawing lengths to the actual lengths?
!
ú Thescalefactoristheconstantofproportionality,ortheintheequation=or=!oreven=
MP.2 ! whereistheactuallength,isthescaledrawinglength,andisthevalueoftheratioofthe drawing length to the corresponding actual length.
§ How can we use the scale factor to determine the actual measurements?
ú Divideeachdrawinglength,,bythescalefactor,,tofindtheactualmeasurement,x.Thisis
! illustrated by the equation = !.
§ How can we reconsider finding an actual length without dividing?
ú We can let the scale drawing be the first image and the actual picture be the second image. We can calculate the scale factor that relates the given scale drawing length, , to the actual length,. If the actual picture is an enlargement from the scale drawing, then the scale factor is greater than one or
> 1. If the actual picture is a reduction from the scale drawing, then the scale factor is less than one or < 1.
Scaffolding:
A reduction has a scale factor less than 1, and an enlargement has a scale factor greater than 1.
Lesson 18: Computing Actual Lengths from a Scale Drawing.

8 0

3 years ago

Prove that somone help me please