1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rudiy27
3 years ago
12

Experiences of the U.S. government and business personnel working overseas after World War II suggest that language training alo

ne is a sufficient form of preparation for working in foreign countries.
History
1 answer:
Amanda [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

This statement is FALSE.

Explanation:

Even though knowing and learning a new language is a neccesary requisite in order to work in a foreing country, it is not enough. Other kind of trainning requires to go abroad and work in a different country with different not only language, but culture.

The experience of the U.S government and businnes personnel working overseas after Wolrd Warr II show how the culutral difference is something so important for  people to understand each other. People interpet reality and even languae accoring to certain paramenters influenced by social and cultural background.

You might be interested in
What are two reasons the trend in immigration changed?
Schach [20]

Answer:

Migration and Refugees. Migration issues are fraught with moral positions, confusion, and unexpected connections. Pulitzer Center grantees look at the effects of climate and business on migration, the efforts of immigrants to preserve their own cultural identity, and the sacrifices they make in leaving family behind

Explanation:

.In 1970, recently arrived immigrants (30%) were more likely than U.S.-born adults (23%) to have completed at least some college. However, U.S.-born adults surpassed newly arrived immigrants by 1990. In 2013, 57% of newly arrived immigrants had completed at least some college, compared with 61% of U.S. adults.

5 0
3 years ago
100 POINTS PLEASE HELP
Pepsi [2]

Answer:

Declaration of Independence

Us constitution

War of 1812

Mexican American

Civil war begins

End of civil war

Emancipation proclamation

13th amendment

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one effect of the Roosevelt corollary on Latin America?
dedylja [7]

Answer:

Correct answer is A. The United States built a canal in Panama.

Explanation:

Option A is the correct one. President Roosevelt decided to create a canal after United States gained control of the area. They started building the channel in 1904, and was finished by 1914.

Option B is not correct as Latin American states weren't able to prevent United States to show their strength in this period.

Option C is not correct as United States prevented any new colonialism of continent.

Option D is not correct as United States totally had political control on the continent.

4 0
3 years ago
The Mexican-American War resulted in more rewards for the U.S. than just land acquisition. Which was another major consequence o
lions [1.4K]
D because of the undiscovered metals that they have just found
6 0
3 years ago
In the myth of the "Self-Made Man", what did business tycoons claim their success was simply the result of? What was the actual
True [87]

Answer:

The Self-Made Myth exposes the false claim that business success is the result of heroic individual effort with little or no outside help. Brian Miller and Mike Lapham bust the myth and present profiles of business leaders who recognize the public investments and supports that made their success possible—including Warren Buffett, Ben Cohen of Ben and Jerry’s, New Belgium Brewing CEO Kim Jordan, and others. The book also thoroughly demolishes the claims of supposedly self-made individuals such as Donald Trump and Ross Perot. How we view the creation of wealth and individual success is critical because it shapes our choices on taxes, regulation, public investments in schools and infrastructure, CEO pay, and more. It takes a village to raise a business—it’s time to recognize that fact.

This book challenges a central myth that underlies today’s antigovernment rhetoric: that an individual’s success is the result of gumption and hard work alone. Miller and Lapham clearly show that personal success is closely tied to the supports society provides.

Explanation:

it’s worth mentioning briefly an additional impact that the self-made myth has on our public debates—that of people voting their aspirations. Because the rags-to-riches myth persists, many Americans hold on to the belief, however unlikely, that they too may one day become wealthy. This has at times led to people’s voting their aspirations rather than their reality. As Michael Moore noted in 2003:

After fleecing the American public and destroying the American Dream for most working people, how is it that, instead of being drawn and quartered and hung at dawn at the city gates, the rich got a big wet kiss from Congress in the form of a record tax break, and no one says a word? How can that be? I think it’s because we’re still addicted to the Horatio Alger fantasy drug. Despite all the damage and all the evidence to the contrary, the average American still wants to hang on to this belief that maybe, just maybe, he or she (mostly he) just might make it big after all.35

It is essential that we find a more honest and complete narrative of wealth creation. In chapter 2, we expose the fallacy of the self-made myth by examining the stories of individuals often lifted up as successes in our public dialogues. In examining their stories, we come to better understand that even their business success includes contributions from society, from government, from other individuals, and even luck.

Beyond the moralizing ridiculed by Twain, this individual success myth overlooked a number of key social and environmental factors. The emergence of a clear geography of opportunity showed that there was something about the place where one lived that contributed to one’s success. No matter what personal qualities someone had, if you lived in Appalachia or the South, your chances of ascending the ladder to great wealth were slim. Those who achieved great wealth were almost invariably from the bustling industrial cities of the Northeast. By one estimate, three out of four millionaires in the nineteenth century were from New England, New York, or Pennsylvania.7

Another unique external factor was the opportunity that existed at that time, thanks to expanding frontiers and seemingly unlimited natural resources. The United States was conquering and expropriating land from native people and distributing it to railroads, White homesteaders, and land barons. Most of the major Gilded Age fortunes were tied to cornering a market and exploiting natural resources such as minerals, oil, and timber. Even P. T. Barnum, the celebrated purveyor of individual success aphorisms, had to admit in Art of Money Getting that “in the United States, where we have more land than people, it is not at all difficult for persons in good health to make money.”8

He might have added that it also helped to be male, to be free rather than a slave, and to be White. While free Blacks had some rights in the North, they had little opportunity to achieve the rags-to-riches dream because of both informal and legal discrimination. Even after the Civil War, Blacks, Asians, and others were largely excluded from governmental programs like the Homestead Act that distributed an astounding 10 percent of all US lands—270 million acres—to 1.6 million primarily White homesteaders.9

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is declaring faith the first five pillars of Islam
    14·2 answers
  • How successful was Roosevelt in persuading his listeners to agree with his point of view? Do you think this speech was successfu
    7·2 answers
  • American involvement in World War I helped to ensure the passage of the Eighteenth Amendment, which?
    5·1 answer
  • What major trade route between and china was nicknamed for the type of good it moved
    7·2 answers
  • What event lead to the former alliance between the Soviet Union and the United States to unravel?
    15·1 answer
  • Who ruled rome between 616 to 509 B.C.E?
    14·2 answers
  • The savings and loan (S & L) scandal
    5·1 answer
  • What did Iran do to our NAVY?
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement describes a characteristics of democracy
    8·1 answer
  • Find the area of the triangle.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!