Dividing tasks between employees always eliminates the possibility of collusion, but this is wrong.
Segregation of duties is important for effective internal control because it reduces the risk of errors or improper conduct. Preventing collusion helps fight fraud.
Separation of duties is an important practice to reduce the occurrence of errors and fraud by ensuring that employees do not have the opportunity to commit or conceal errors or fraud in the performance of their duties. That is internal control.
Separation of duties reduces the risk of fraud or misconduct as each affected employee has access controls and restrictions in place. Task division is delegating different steps of the process to different people to delegate important functions.
To learn more about collusion
brainly.com/question/14409158
#SPJ4
Answer:
<u>$1,300</u>
Explanation:
Only the cost that are directly related to the business conference is to be deducted as Melissa's business tax. Sightseeing cost is therefore not part of her original plan. The business related cost are therefore;
- <u>$400 for round-trip airfare to San Francisco</u>
- <u> $250 fee to register for the conference,</u>
- <u> $300 per night for three night’s lodging,</u>
- <u> $200 for meals, and</u>
- <u> $150 for cab fare.</u>
A summation of this cost would give $1,300 as the amount of the total costs that can Melissa deduct as business expenses.
Answer:
The establishment of social welfare programs.
Explanation:
This is the answer for Ap3x.
Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
