Answer:
Explanation:
nsei kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkao
Answer:
D. maturity
Explanation:
A product life cycle is divided into four, namely, introduction, growth, maturity, and decline. The concept of the product life's cycle is used as a decision-making tool to help management know when to expand to new markets, increase advertising, adjust prices, or redesign a product.
The maturity cycle is the third stage of a product life cycle. At this stage, sales revenues and sale volume reach the peak. The market get saturated with very few new customers. The product growth becomes stagnant. Profits may begin to decline at this stage.
Answer:
enterprise resource planning.
Explanation:
Enterprise resource planning involves management of main business processes and usually involves use of software. ERP supports similar processes based on the department it is deployed to.
For example ERP can be set up in a company to define various functions of human resources, accounting, amd operations.
The software used for each division will be tailored to their needs. Operations will be more towards everyday processes of production and customer service, while for human resources it will support more of data analysis for effective people management and performance related activities.
Answer:
267 output
Explanation:
The computation of the output produced in the short run is shown below:
As it is given that
AVC i.e average variable cost function = 4.0 - 0.0024Q + 0.000006Q^2
And,
FC i.e fixed cost = $500.
Plus we know that
Total variable cost i.e TVC = AVC × Q i.e Quantity
So,
AVC × Q = TVC
= 4Q - 0.0024Q^2 + 0.000006Q^3
And,
The total cost = Total variable cost + Fixed cost
So,
TC = TVC + FC
= 4Q-.0024Q^2 + .000006Q^3 +$500.
And, the MC i.e marginal cost is
= Total cost ÷ Quantity
MC = 4 - 0.0048Q + 0.000018Q^2
MC = 4
So,
Price = MC i.e 4
4 - .0048Q + .000018Q^2 = 4
So after solving this Q is 266.67 i.e 267 output
Answer:
c. exculpatory evidence
Explanation:
Exculpatory evidence -
It refers to the evidence or the clues , which helps the defendant on proving him not guilty , is referred to as exculpatory evidence .
It is exactly reverse of the inculpatory evidence , which claims to make the person guilty .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct option is c. exculpatory evidence .
