Answer:
10781
Explanation:
In order to find the additional annual revenue for the two method a break even point must be calculated
Method A
=-8000(1.1)^6+20000(1.1)^6-22000-(u)
=-15776.44-22000 -u
=-37776.44-u
Method B
= -52000(1.1)^6+15000(1.1)^6-17000-2u
=9995.4-17000-2u
=-26995.47-2u
Then equate the two equations
-37776.44-u=-26995.47-2u
u=10781
Answer:
B. overstate the predetermined overhead rate.
Explanation:
As we know
The Predetermined overhead rate would be equal to
Predetermined overhead rate = (Total estimated manufacturing overhead) ÷ (estimated direct labor-hours or machine hours)
In the given question, the direct labor cost is used for computing the predetermined overhead rate which is already wrong.
To find out the predetermined overhead rate, we always use the indirect cost instead of direct cost
This error could overstate the predetermined overhead rate as it would increase the indirect labor due to which overhead is also increased. So, automatically the rate would also be increased.
Answer:
c. $2.0 million for Lopes and by $2.5 million for HomeMax.
Explanation:
For the problem above, the two organizations agreed to work on a particular project because they believed that they will benefit from the outcome of the project. Based on the available information provided in the question, the profit that Lopes will make yearly will increase by $2.0 million while that of HomeMax will increase by $2.5 million.
Premium is not included in all contracts.
Offer is very important, time requirements is also a must in a contract, consideration is also stated in the contracts, but premium is not included in the contract.
Answer:
The contract would be described as <em>International Contract.</em>
Explanation:
<em>International Contracts: </em>International contracts refers to a legally binding agreement between parties based in different countries, in which they are obligated to do or not do certain things. International contracts may be written in a formal way such as the example of Frank contracting an Indian television provider.
Consequently, Frank and the Indian television provider having entered into a contract, are governed by international contract law unless they agree to abide by the laws of one of the US and India.
Moreover, <em>International sales contracts </em>are governed by the <em>United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) from 1980.</em>
