Answer: Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Old market price of stock = $15
New market price of stock = $18
Here, we assume that EPS be $5.
So,
Price-earning ratio at old price = 
= 
= 3
Price-earning ratio at New price = 
= 
= 3.6
Hence, price-earnings ratio increases.
Answer:
236.23
Explanation:
The computation of X is shown below:-
As per the time-weighted method
The 6-month yield
= (40 ÷ 50) × (80 ÷ 60) × (157.50 ÷ 160) - 1
= 5%
Annual equivalent = (1.05)^2 - 1
= 10.25%
1 - year yield = (40 ÷ 50) × (80 ÷ 60) × (175 ÷ 160) × (X ÷ 250) - 1
= 0.1025
X(0.004667) = 1.1025
X = 236.23
Therefore on December 31st the value of account of X = 236.25
Answer: The correct option is C.
Explanation: From the scenario given above, we can see that Thomas has not shown any intention to replace the expensive team members, the only option in this case would then be to properly utilize their expertise to the advantage of the company.
In order to do this therefore, a SWOT analysis would need to be carried out and utilized in gaining an edge over the competition.
In this case, Thomas would make sure that the expertise of all his team members are brought to bare, the company would analyze the competition to see where it is lacking in customer satisfaction, and then try to gain the upper hand by including features in their product that the competition does not have in theirs.
This strategy will help in achieving a competitive advantage.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Current assets are the assets that a company had and which are expected to be either used or sold over the next year. Examples of current assets are cash, cash equivalents, stock inventory, accounts receivable, marketable securities, and other liquid assets.
It should be noted that when the sales of a from continue to grow, the current assets of such company also increases. An example is when there is an increase in the sales increase, this.will also have an impact on the firm's inventories as there will be an increase.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A more precise way to describe the situation is that Joe's pizza parlor is a monopolistic competition. But that definition considers that all 'food' items have some degree of close substitute relation.
But yes, if you consider this two conditions:
- a broad definition of monopoly
- other restaurants are not considered close substitutes for the food sold at the pizza parlor
Then yes, Joe has monopoly