Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the proper sorts of normal consequences. here the word “typical effects” of an motion method the whole lot the movement brings about, inclusive of the action itself.
Rule consequentialist theories claim that the rightness or wrongness of an act is decided (in a roundabout way) by way of the non-moral price of the consequences of our accepting a moral code that requires or prohibits that act.
Consequentialism is an ethical idea that judges whether or not or not something is proper via what its results are. for instance, the majority would agree that mendacity is inaccurate. but if telling a lie could help keep someone's life, consequentialism says it is the proper component to do.
Learn more about Consequentialism here: brainly.com/question/15688893
#SPJ4
Answer:
1. Knapping
2. Different technique implies different people
3. The desert areas of nowadays Arabia were once green areas.
4. Food shortage and/or climate changes
5. See explination nr. 2
Explanation:
1. 'Knapping' is the process of knocking of flakes of a stone.
2. Theories of archeologists are very often based on (logic) assumptions. When there is a certain stone tool technique in one and another in a different place, they assume they must be from different people.
3. The migration by land was made possible through climate changes that ranges from an ice corridor that once connected Alaska with Iberia, to more hospitable environments of lakes and rivers with an abundance of plants and animals in what is now the Arabic desert.
4. The same climate change (warming up) that caused more hospitable environments - deeply connected with foodsupply - along the mediterranean sea might have caused a dryer and less hospitable environment in East Africa.
5 is answered the same way as question nr. 2 but now with the same tools, and thus the same people who must have traveled.
P.S. Archeologists agree on the emigration of early humans from Africa to other continents; they don´t agree on When. Genetic study claims that it was about 60.000 years ago, but the findings at Jebel Faya and other places suggest that this might have happened (much) earlier.
<span>They would take the east trail up bulgaria</span>
Answer:
Generalization
Explanation:
Kadin formerly lived in a region of political unrest and experienced frequent exposure to dangerous gunfire. He currently resides in a region of relative political and social calm. However, when exposed to loud noises such as fireworks, Kadin assumes a defensive posture, crouching behind objects and hiding. A psychologist would MOST likely attribute Kadin's behavior to generalization because Kadin has the tendency to respond in the same way to different but similar stimuli such as his experience with frequent exposure to dangerous gunfire and Kadin was also exposed to loud noises such as fireworks, he assumes a defensive posture, crouching behind objects and hiding therefore Kadin behaviour is attributed to Generalization.
I believe the answer is: A. Austria
At that time period, Austria was regarded as one of the strongest empire in Europe. He knew that he wouldn't stand a chance if he choose to fight with Austria heads on. Because of this, he choose to seek help with Austria's economic competitors such as France, Belgium, and England.