Im not sure but answer my question plz
Which two central ideas can be found in both sources?
Answer choices for the above question
1.Certain rights and freedoms come from nature.
2.A bill of rights is necessary to protect the citizens.
3.The Constitution protects the freedom of the press.
4.Governments are prone to restrict individual freedom.
5.The rights and freedoms of citizens are important in a democratic society.
6.A bill of rights would be dangerous to the public safety in a democratic society.
Ancient india and ancient Egypt,they both had temples to honor their god(s).
Urban growth in the context of structural adjustment, currency devaluations, state retrenchments, and little or no housing provision.• Viewing the state as a 'market enabler' led to theled to the privatisation of utilities and services, and massive decreases in provision;• For individuals, their various needs - affordable commodities, accommodation close to jobs, security, and the possibility of owning property - were<span>simply ignored by the imposition of ill-suited neoliberal 'boot-strap capitalism'.</span>
Andrew Jackson started the "Bank War" over the rechartering of the Second Bank of the United States. Proponents of the bank said that it encouraged westward expansion, expanded international commerce using credit, and helped reduce the government's debt. Jackson, on the other hand, was heavily against the BUS, calling it a danger to the liberties of the people. A champion for the rights of the common man, he advocated to protect the farmers and laborers. He claimed that the bank was owned by a small group of upperclass men, who only became richer by pocketing the money paid by the poorer common man for loans.
Jackson argued against the constitutionality of the BUS that was upheld about fourteen years before, during the 1819 McCulloch v. Maryland case. One of the points of the unanimous decision in that case stated that Congress had the power to establish the bank. Jackson, however, said that McCulloch v. Maryland could not prevent him from declaring a presidential veto on the bank if he believed it unconstitutional. He said that the decision in that 1819 case “ought not to control the coordinate authorities of this Government. The Congress, the Executive, and the Court must each for itself be guided by its own opinion of the Constitution," meaning that the 1819 decision could not control his interpretation of the Constitution or prevent him from doing what he thought was right. This point of view earned him the nickname "King Andrew I" from his critics, who saw his use of the veto and his attempted intrusion on congressional power as power-hungry behavior. In the end, Jackson was successful in challenging the bank, as its charter expired in 1836. He had successfully killed the "monster" that was the Bank of the United States.
After the war was over, much rebuilding and reconstruction needed to be done to aid the economies of the European nations, for they were the ones that were most harmed by the war, The Marshall Plan gave the European Nations about 13 Billion Dollars to do so. Therefore, the answer would be A since the money did aid Europe and because America was the one that gave it, it did promote prosperity and democracy
Answer: A
Hope this helped!! :D
