1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shkiper50 [21]
3 years ago
6

List three numbers in order from least to greatest 8251, 8125, 8512

Mathematics
2 answers:
svp [43]3 years ago
4 0
8125, 8251, 8512 from least to greatest
Darya [45]3 years ago
3 0
8125
8251
8512
from least to greatest
You might be interested in
160 bananas;20%decrease
Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

128 banana's... I would work it all out for u but the teacher just came in my room and had a go

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Exercise 3 Iron Man is checking out a new suit that fires lasers more accurately. If he is aiming for a bullseye, his original s
Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer: (a). insufficient evidence.

(b). sufficient evidence

(c). insufficient evidence

Step-by-step explanation:

we will analyse this carefully to help us understand it better.

we have the standard deviation for the original suit = 2mm

standard deviation for new suit = 1.6mm

given n = 1.6

from the question we know that  the  suit with less standard deviation is better than the other suit

considering a null hypothesis;

H₀ : б ≥ 2, (here the new suit is not better than the original alternative hypothesis).

Also Hi : б < 2 (we have here that the new suit is better than the original )

using the Chi-Square distribution with n-1 degree of freedom to test the claim about the value of the standard deviation;

X² = (n-1) s²/ б² = (16-1)(1.6)² / (2)² = 9.6

taking the P value of X² (9.6) for 15 D O F  from the P value table gives us

1-0.8441 = 0.1559

also ∝ = 0.05

where P-value > ∝ (0.05)

we can see from here that there is insufficient evidence to claim that new suit is better than that of the original suit, having failed to neglect H₀

(b). Given n = 100 and s = 1.6

then we have that X² = (n-1) s²/ б² = (100-1)(1.6)² / (2)² = 63.36

P-value of X² at 99 dif gives 0.0020

where ∝ = 0.05

since P value < ∝

rejecting the null hypothesis H₀,

we can safely say that there is sufficient claim that the new suit is better than the original at 95%.

(c). where we have that ∝ = 0.001

for part(b) P-values = 0.0020

given P-value > ∝ ;

we fail to neglect the null hypothesis.

From this we can say that the is insufficient evidence backing the claim thhat the new suit is better than the original suit at 99.99% confidence level.

cheers i hope this helps!!!!!

5 0
3 years ago
This week, Marie trimmed 61% of the bushes in her yard. Katie trimmed 7/20 of the bushes in her yard. Who has trimmed a greater
NemiM [27]
Answer- Marie
7/20 = 0.35 = 35%
61% > 35%
5 0
1 year ago
Arc measure with equations
Alona [7]

Answer:131

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following are equivalent
Nataly_w [17]
Where’s the question?
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • My teacher did not teach me this I was absent so can someone please help me
    12·1 answer
  • Express 0.88 as a percent
    8·2 answers
  • The original pair of shoes is $42 the sale price is 20% off the original price what is the amount off the original price
    10·1 answer
  • Can you find the distance using the graph?
    12·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!
    8·1 answer
  • Use the GCF to factor 32x+56
    5·1 answer
  • What is the equation of the line that passes through the point (-7, 2) and has a slope of -1?​
    9·1 answer
  • Please help solve this and show work
    9·1 answer
  • Please help me! : find the median please
    12·2 answers
  • If you can solve this, your a genius..<br> 900 + 1 = ?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!