I believe it’s c but I could be wrong
Answer: option c or 3 because you gotta take out the 6 so u do -6 which left is negative and right is positive and then get rid of the +2 exponent so up is positive and down is negative so you move -2 which is down.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The perimeter of quadrilateral PQRS is equal to the sum of its four length sides
the formula to calculate the distance between two points is equal to
we have
the vertices P(2,4), Q(2,3), R(-2,-2), and S(-2,3)
step 1
Find the distance PQ
P(2,4), Q(2,3)
substitute in the formula
step 2
Find the distance QR
Q(2,3), R(-2,-2)
substitute in the formula
step 3
Find the distance RS
R(-2,-2), and S(-2,3)
substitute in the formula
step 4
Find the distance PS
P(2,4), S(-2,3)
substitute in the formula
step 5
Find the perimeter
substitute the values
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The complete question is given thus:
Suppose that computer literacy among people ages 40 and older is being studied and that the accompanying tables describes the probability distribution for four randomly selected people, where x is the number that are computer literate. Is it unusual to find four computer literates among four randomly selected people?
x P(x)
0 0.16
1 0.25
2 0.36
3 0.15
4 0.08
ANSWER:
The odds that this will occur according to the chart are 0.08, or 8%, so although this is unlikely, it's not terribly unusual.
⇒ NO
So from the following we can say it is not unusual to find four (4) computer literates among four randomly selected people.
ok, so P(1) + P(2) + P(3) + P(4) + P(0) = 0.16+0.25+0.36+0.15+0.08 = 1
Whereas the chance of finding four (4) out of four (4) computer iteration is low when compared to other factors.
cheers i hope this helped !!
