No problem, hope you got help
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) h<span>e upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.</span>
The correct answer is D. Specific knowledge is excludable, while general knowledge is not excludable.
Explanation:
General knowledge refers to information, facts, etc. that are basic, and due to this, they are known by most of the people. Indeed, general knowledge is obtained through basic education, interaction with others and exposition to media. Moreover, general knowledge covers multiple areas. On the other hand, specific knowledge focuses on specific areas and covers complex facts, information, etc. Also, in most cases, specific knowledge can only be acquired through formal training or education.
Besides, in terms of excludability (quality of a service or product that needs to be paid to be acquired), specific knowledge is mainly excludable because people who do not pay for formal training cannot obtain it. On the opposite, general knowledge is not excludable as this can be obtained for free, and therefore it is not possible to control this (Option D).
Answer:
Many people do not realize that helium is a non-renewable resource. It is made on earth via nuclear decay of uranium, and it is recovered from mines. Once it is released into the atmosphere it becomes uneconomical to recapture it, and eventually atmospheric helium will escape earth altogether because it is so light.
Explanation:
Because they needed it to pay for their war expenses, which they felt was needed to 'protect' the colonists.
