Which do you think would be the hardest pillar to fulfill.
<span>1.Shahadah - Declaration of faith </span>
<span>2.Salah - Prayer [5 prayers a day] </span>
<span>3.Zakah - Charity [Giving 2.5% to a charity] </span>
<span>4.Sawn - Fasting </span>
<span>5.Hajj - Pilgrimage. </span>
<span>For me it would be Hajj cause I don't like traveling. </span>
<span>Also in todays society and where I live , Salah would be pretty hard to follow as well. </span>
<span>I'm not posting this Q to waste time by the way.Its Homework for R.S</span>
<u>(1) the power to make final decision</u> : authourity<u>
(2) approve</u> : ratify
<u>(3) someone who is not in military</u> : civilian
<u>(4) men who supported the constitution </u> : federalists
<u>(5) the 18 power of congress </u> : enumerated power
<u>(6) limits the actions of government leader</u> : rule of law
Answer:
people report feeling like they have become closer to their ideal self
Explanation:
Hello. Unfortunately you did not submit the study the question refers to. However, it is possible to consider that the answer presented above is the correct answer, because Rogerian psychotherapy is a type of therapy centered on the individual, with the objective of making the individual recognize and understand their ideal self, which can promote many improvements in the the individual's life. This type of therapy was developed by Carl Roger in 1940.
Answer: A. High- High
Explanation: Ethical dissonance as such arises due to inconsistencies in attaining and maintaining a moral image of oneself and being tempted to exploit some unethical situation for the sake of personal gain. In other words, it is the interaction of the company / organisation and the individual with the aim of adapting the individual and the organisation in different possible situations and scenarios. It is a two-way process because the ethics of an individual influences the organisation, simply the individual enters his / her ethics. Also the ethics of the organisation influences the behaviour of the individual.
Of the four possible fit models / options, high-high is one of two fit options that have a high person-organisation fit. So this is a model that provides a fit relationship between the organisation and the individual. When an individual has a high level of ethics, and organisation too, fit with an organisation of course high. That's the case here.
There is another high fit, therefore the agreement of organisations and individuals, but this is not the case here, when a person is of low ethics. Then for that individual it is a high fit of course if it is also a low ethics organisation, such an organisation suits a low ethics individual.
The other two cases of fit are when there is a low level of fit between the organisation and the individual.
