When a blue ocean strategy fails, a company lacks both a distinct point of uniqueness and a distinct cost-leadership profile. The phrase <u>"stuck in the middle"</u> describes this circumstance.
<h3><u>What does "Blue Ocean Strategy" entail?</u></h3>
Blue Ocean Strategy is applicable to all industries and types of businesses. It is not exclusive to a single company. In the current business climate, the majority of businesses compete fiercely for market share. The viability of a company's operations is always a possibility when the product is subject to pricing pressure.
This circumstance typically arises when the company is competing in a crowded market, also referred to as a "Red Ocean." Businesses aim to locate verticals or new company opportunities where they can enjoy uncontested market share or a "Blue Ocean" where there is little possibility for growth. There is a "blue ocean" when there is the potential for larger profitability despite existing or insignificant competition.
<u></u>
Learn more about cost leadership with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14975894
#SPJ4
<u></u>
That is very hard. We can not control our thoughts, but we can focus our energy on something else that makes up block their thoughts.
"Where your focus goes, your energy flows"
When you focus on other people's thoughts all ur energy is toward that, and you will keep thinking about them. Do something cool, work on ur dream, eat some food, and watch a good movie. Whatever u want or think u can attract it by being positive and saying to your self, I am more, and worth it. and say I'm thinking about me, myself, and my love of whatever or dream lol :DD
The second Amendment: the right to bear arms
Explanation:
I believe the second amendment should be abolished. I believe it should be abolished because, The second amendment is very dangerous. It is very dangerous if it is in the wrong arms. Only though some countries allow people “to bear arms” It’s not safe. That is why I think the Second Amendment should be removed.
Answer:
Explanation:
In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally, the Court declared that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves were categorized as property.