Answer:
Option d is the right one.
Explanation:
- Marginal research or analysis to optimize future gains as a decision-making method. In comparison to the expenses incurred by this same behavior, it calculates added benefits. The illustration described demonstrates that the marginal gain is smaller than that of the marginal cost.
- This involves purchasing goods until the marginal gain is equal to the marginal cost.
The other options aren't sufficient for the scenario provided. But that will be the best alternative for option d.
The best support against a 0% inflation target given by the economic literature is c. A 0% inflation target could lead to deflation.
<h3>Why is a 0% inflation target risky?</h3>
If 0% inflation is targeted, the policy might be so effective that inflation becomes negative and deflation happens.
When deflation happens, the economy will experience hardships with lower production levels that will impact other sectors of the economy.
Options for this question include:
a. It is undisputed that too little inflation interferes with the downward adjustment of real wages.
b. Moderate to high inflation is popular among consumers.
c. A 0% inflation target could lead to deflation
Find out more on deflation at brainly.com/question/13562161.
#SPJ12
Answer:
The Future value at year time is $4,260
Explanation:
The future value at the end of the year one can be found by using the compounding formula which is as under:
Future Value = Present Value * (1 +r)^n
Future Value = $4,000 * (1.065)^ 1 = $4,260
Answer:
Cash shorting = 36,010 - 36,006 = $4
DR Cash $36,006
Cash Short and Over $ 4
CR Sales $36,010
There is a shortage of cash as the sales figure is more than the cash amount. The Cash Short and Over account will therefore be debited to reflect this expense.