Answer:
C) category points-of-parity.
Explanation:
With category points-of-parity the emphasis is on Nivea brand offering the relevant category features. These are features a brand must have to be considered competitors in a particular industry.
So for deodorants people want to know if they are strong, will the shampoo clean effectively, and will cosmetics be colourful.
Without these key features in the products Nivea would lose competitive advantage.
The total investment stayed at the same constant value which is no changes have appeared from April to June<span>. From April to May, there was no difference between the month to month total investment value (0 = (500+400)-(600+300)). There was also no difference between the month to month total investment value from May to June (0 = (600+300)-(400+500)).</span>
Hello! Public goods are goods that are 1) non-rivalrous and 2) non-excludable. Non-rivalrous means that continuous consumption of these goods will not diminish its quantity for other consumers while non-excludable means that consumers (regardless of whether or not they paid) cannot be excluded for consuming the good. Software is an example of a public good.
Now, because of the non-exclusion nature of these goods, private firms will have the free-rider problem (those consumers who use the good without paying). Because of the non-rivalrous nature they are also bound to have a huge demand and therefore they will have a tendency to underproduce hence these goods will be unprofitable.
Lastly, since not all is bound to pay for these public goods, the price system cannot assign the cost to all consumers.
This leaves us with choice D as the only reason why private firms do not produce public goods.
ANSWER: D. the government refuses to grant subsidies to firms who provide public goods
Answer:
Dribbling is a technique used in field hockey to move the ball forward using small touches with a hockey stick.
Answer:
The amortization expense that should be recorded by Smith & Sons in the second year is $3,750
Explanation:
The computation of the amortization expense in the second year is shown below:
= (Cost of patent) ÷ (expected economic life of the patent)
= ($45,000) ÷ (12 years)
= $3,750
The amortization expense should be the same for the expected life i.e 12 years
For more understanding, we pass the journal entry which is shown below:
Amortization expenses A/c Dr $3,750
To Patent A/c $3,750
(Being amortization expense recorded)