1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
serious [3.7K]
3 years ago
13

3. Two-thirds of a number plus 4 is 76. What is the number?​

Mathematics
2 answers:
max2010maxim [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

108

Step-by-step explanation:

2/3x+4=76

2/3x=72

x=72*3/2

x=108

Serga [27]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Do the opposite of what they say

76 - 4 = 72

72 / 2/3 = 72 x 3 / 2 = 216 / 2 = 108

108 is the number

now to double check

108 x 2/3 = 216 / 3 = 72

72 + 4 = 76

108 is the number

Hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
1. Input
wel

Answer:

The equilibrium point represents the raising or lowering the price in response to changes in the supply or demand.

If the price of a good is above equilibrium, this means that the quantity of the good supplied exceeds the quantity of the good demanded.

If the quantity is below the equilibrium point, it will create a shortage. because the quantity supplied is less than quantity demanded.

Hope this helps!

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
A line has a slope of 5 and passes through the point
podryga [215]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation is mx+b=y.

M=slope (in this case 5)

x=x coordinates

b=y intercept

y=y coordinates

For the x and y coordinates, I'll use (2,0).

5(2)+_=0

10+_=0.

In this case, we only have one awnser, -10. Since 10+(-10) are the only ways to equal 0.

Hope this helps,

5 0
3 years ago
Use a proof by contradiction to show that the square root of 3 is national You may use the following fact: For any integer kirke
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

1. Let us proof that √3 is an irrational number, using <em>reductio ad absurdum</em>. Assume that \sqrt{3}=\frac{m}{n} where  m and n are non negative integers, and the fraction \frac{m}{n} is irreducible, i.e., the numbers m and n have no common factors.

Now, squaring the equality at the beginning we get that

3=\frac{m^2}{n^2} (1)

which is equivalent to 3n^2=m^2. From this we can deduce that 3 divides the number m^2, and necessarily 3 must divide m. Thus, m=3p, where p is a non negative integer.

Substituting m=3p into (1), we get

3= \frac{9p^2}{n^2}

which is equivalent to

n^2=3p^2.

Thus, 3 divides n^2 and necessarily 3 must divide n. Hence, n=3q where q is a non negative integer.

Notice that

\frac{m}{n} = \frac{3p}{3q} = \frac{p}{q}.

The above equality means that the fraction \frac{m}{n} is reducible, what contradicts our initial assumption. So, \sqrt{3} is irrational.

2. Let us prove now that the multiplication of an integer and a rational number is a rational number. So, r\in\mathbb{Q}, which is equivalent to say that r=\frac{m}{n} where  m and n are non negative integers. Also, assume that k\in\mathbb{Z}. So, we want to prove that k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Z}. Recall that an integer k can be written as

k=\frac{k}{1}.

Then,

k\cdot r = \frac{k}{1}\frac{m}{n} = \frac{mk}{n}.

Notice that the product mk is an integer. Thus, the fraction \frac{mk}{n} is a rational number. Therefore, k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Q}.

3. Let us prove by <em>reductio ad absurdum</em> that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is an irrational number. So, we have x is irrational and p\in\mathbb{Q}.

Write q=x+p and let us suppose that q is a rational number. So, we get that

x=q-p.

But the subtraction or addition of two rational numbers is rational too. Then, the number x must be rational too, which is a clear contradiction with our hypothesis. Therefore, x+p is irrational.

7 0
3 years ago
Combine the like terms to create an equivalent expression<br> -k - ( - 8k)
Svetllana [295]

____________________________________________________

Answer:

7k

____________________________________________________

Step-by-step explanation:

We are trying to combine like terms with the expression: -k - ( - 8k)

We are pretty much solving it.

Solve:

-k - ( - 8k)

The "- ( -" turns into a plus sign.

So it would look like:

-k - -8k or -k + 8k

Now, you would finish solving

-k + 8k = 7k

____________________________________________________

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
9÷(-3)=what is the answer
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

your answer is -3

i hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Prove that if the set of vectors {u1, u2, u3} is linearly dependent and u4 is any vector, then the set {u1, u2, u3, u4} is linea
    14·1 answer
  • Four married couples have reserved eight seats in a row at the theater. If they arrange themselves​ randomly, what is the probab
    5·1 answer
  • What does p divided by 6 means?
    8·1 answer
  • Which trigonometric ratio is incorrect
    12·2 answers
  • Which expression below is an equivalent expression to: (13n^4+12n^3-3+8n^2)+(-11n^2-n^3)
    12·1 answer
  • At school 2 out of every 5 students in the sixth grade are members of the band which ratio represents the number of 6th graders
    9·1 answer
  • 5x+12=44 then value of 5x-12=?​
    7·1 answer
  • Match the equivalent expressions.
    14·1 answer
  • How many times greater is the value of the 3 in 3,499 than in 6,399
    11·1 answer
  • . The perimeter of a square is 8y – 12. The area of the square is 100 square units. What is the value of y?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!