Answer:
Debt to income ratio is all your debt payments divided by all the money you earn during a month. Generally you are considered to be in good financial shape when your debt to income ratio is less than 20%, if it's less than 10% it is even better.
Kim's gross income = $1,230 - $165 (taxes) = $1,065
Kim's total debt payments without new debt = $134 (credit card payments)
Kim's total debt payments including new debt = $134 + $172 (new debt) = $306
Kim's debt to income ration without new debt = $134 / $1,065 = 12.58%
Kim's debt to income ration with new debt = $306 / $1,065 = 28.73%
Currently Kim's debt to income ratio is only 12.58% which is very good, but if she takes the new loan then her ratio will increase to 28.73% which is extremely high and not prudent.
Answer:
B) 1,160.
Explanation:
First we must calculate planned aggregate expenditures (PAE) and then determine where Y = PAE:
PAE = consumption + planned investment + government spending + net exports = 100 + 0.75(Y - 40) + 50 + 150 +20 = 100 + 0.75Y - 30 + 50 + 150 + 20 = 290 + 0.75Y
Now we must determine where Y and PAE intercept:
Y = 290 + 0.75Y
Y - 0.75Y = 290
0.25Y = 290
Y = 290 / 0.25 = 1,160
*Planned aggregate expenditure = total planned spending, it differs from GDP because GDP includes unplanned investment.
PAE = C + Ip + G + NX while GDP = C + I + G + NX
Uhh like any other job it varies but uhh on average I’d say about $50,000 a year. But it ranges from 15,000 to 120,000. And the average hourly pay is like $16-$25 and hour.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
In the telecom industry, the threat of new entrants is most likely low. Why? - Because:
1. High brand loyalty meaning that the existing customers are unlikely to switch to any competitors be it existing or potential. This will discourage any new entrant.
2. High economies of scale. They are enjoying low cost of inputs with high outputs. New entrants will find it difficult initially to produce at low cost. This will also discourage new entrants.
Also, the presence of strong network effects and proprietary technology among the existing firms will deter new entrants.
Answer:
Chris paid $109.68 for his bond. Since he paid a premium for the bond, the YTM is lower than the coupon rate.
Explanation:
yield of Cheryl's bond is 6% since she purchased it at par and the bond's coupon is 6%
if Chris's bond yields 80% of Cheryl's, it will yield 6% x 0.8 = 4.8%
we can use the approximate yield to maturity formula to find the market price of Chris's bond:
2.4%(semiannual) = {3 + [(100 - MV)/20]} / [(100 + MV)/2]
0.024 x [(100 + MV)/2] = 3 + [(100 - MV)/20]
0.024 x (50 + 0.5MV) = 3 + 5 - 0.05MV
1.2 + 0.012MV = 8 - 0.05MV
0.062MV = 6.8
MV = 6.8 / 0.062 = 109.68
