Answer:Olivia will win the case. The court will rule in her favor on the fact that it will say that they had an implied contract.
Explanation:
What Is an Implied Contract?
An implied contract refers to the actions and conduct which legally binds both parties to an agreement it does not require to be proven by written contract or verbal one.
The example is a product warranty when you buy a Television you expect it to play or a fridge to keep the food cold otherwise if these items don't function after you have bought them this means the implied warranty was not fulfilled.
It has the same legal power as all other contracts
How an Implied Contract Works
This contract state that an individual shall not gain unfairly while the other person suffers as the result of that.
A fair treatment of another person doesn't require a written or verbal agreement.
For example Olivia has offered her service to Desiree and it is expected that Desiree should pay her for her service and the product that she is delivering that is only a fair thing to do it doesn't need to be proven by written agreement.
Someone provide you with their service you are obligated to pay them Desiree is obligated to pay Olivia cause she has delivered the pie to her as usually.
They were important due to the fact that if not for the two John Brown wouldn’t have spoke his thoughts, and he would have never taken the memory from when he was a child and saw the little slave girl hit by a shovel, he wouldn’t have gone public as his father did, it caused a movement that ended slavery, it was important for the United States moving forward to earning freedom.
An action verb refers to an action, that is not a state. Verbs which are NOT action verbs are all verbs of states, most typically the verb "to be". So sentences with the verb "to be" are likely not to contain action verbs: here they're options A C and D - those don't use an action verb.
The correct answer is <span>B. We bought some vegetables for our salad.
and the action verb is: "bought".
</span>
Answer: Critical thinking
Explanation:
What does this principle states?
A person can not use not knowing something as an excuse and we can not used our lack of knowledge as our perception on things.
One needs to collect sufficient factual information to back up their knowledge or claim.
This process has to be done thoroughly and completely by ensuring that one has collected factual evidence on the subject they want to discuss.
Conclusions based on personal views without sufficient facts can not be a ground that one can stand on firmly.
This is the reason Jim wants them to substantiate their views with facts on each candidate that they support which will give their views credibility.
This will cause them to even evaluate their own biases and personal values as they gather as much factual information as possible.
The answer would be equalitarian pluralism<span>
</span>