Answer: Calling the meeting to order
Explanation:
They are similar because relationship amongst police can either affect some and harm others
Answer:
im not 100% sure im understanding the question correctly but go gonna go with you are the employer. :)
Answer:
Two actions which took place.
1) was it a defamation for the publisher - yes,
2) false light? no
Explanation:
It was a defamation of character from the publisher because what he did could cause harm to the young child, One thing is show though the accusation of a false light is a no. And lana can't complain about how her pictrue was made because she was in a public space so no reasonable expectation of privacy.
