Answer:
The answer is 30. 9 divided by 0.3 is 30.
Answer:
For this case the p value calculated is higher than the significance level used of 0.05 so then we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and the best conclusion for this case would be:
a) do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean IQ is not greater than 100
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
We want to verify if he mean IQ of employees in an organization is greater than 100 , the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic for this case is given by:
(1)
The statistic calculated for this case 
The degrees of freedom are given by:
Now we can find the p value using tha laternative hypothesis and we got:
For this case the p value calculated is higher than the significance level used of 0.05 so then we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and the best conclusion for this case would be:
a) do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean IQ is not greater than 100
1) find the lcd the lcd is 12
2)rewrite the fractions 1/4 and 2/3 using 12 as the denominator (second column) you get 3/12 and 8/12
3) since its confusing to subtract 8/12 from 3/12 you need to borrow one form the 126 doing so is the same as taking 12/12 from 126 this change to 125 and the 12/12 adds to the 3/12 making it 15/12
4) subtract 8/12 form 15/12 to get 7/12
5) subtract 78 form 125 to get 47
6) the answer is 47 7/12
4• y because since the brackets are multiplying the dot represents the x
Answer:
when y rename a fraction, you are finding fraction that have the same value but have different name. these are known as equivalent fraction you can rename fraction million of different ways...As long as you multiply numerator and denominator by same number, you will get and equivalent fraction...
Step-by-step explanation:
for example :5/2
5×2/2×2 , 5×3/2×3 , 5×4/2×4 , 5×5/2×5
ANSWER OF THESE EQUIVALENT NUMBERS ARE :
10/4 , 15/6 , 20/8 , 24/10 ....