Answer:
They took there land and hunted there animals
Explanation:
This is a personal question. Therefore, only you would be able to accurately analyze how it is that you evaluate options when making a decision. However, there are some common strategies that people follow when such a problem arises.
One example of such a strategy would be making a pros and cons list. This allows the person to better understand the problems and benefits of each approach. Another strategy would be working your way backwards. This involves thinking of the desired outcome first, and then retracing the steps that might lead you in that direction. A third example involves talking to people who have faced similar challenges and asking them for advice.
Answer:
external
Explanation:
The process of applying the conclusion of a particular scientific study into a study which is outside its context is said to be external validity. The conclusions derived in one particular study is applied to other situations through external validity. There are cases when such generalization brings a negative result to the study. Also, the factor of generalization is limited to some extent.
Answer:
While they were shopping, 6-year-old Elliot came running around one of the store aisles and excitedly asked his mother if she would buy him a $299 Microsoft Xbox 360 game console to use with their television at home. When his mother immediately refused, Elliot looked very dejected but apologized for asking. A few moments later, Elliot asked, "Well, can I get a new basket for my bicycle?" Clever Elliot appears to be using the <u>door-in-the-face</u> technique to persuade his mother.
Explanation:
The door-in-the-face technique is commonly studied in social psychology as a compliance method. The persuader tries to covince the respondent to agree by making a large request that the respondent will reject as it were metaphorically slamming the door in the persuader's face.
In a social program, systematic methods are the resources needed for the program to operate, while evaluations are tangible results of the program process.
<h3>Which kind of methods is commonly used in process evaluations?</h3>
Process evaluation usually uses both quantitative and qualitative methods, that may include structured observations, questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, focus groups and logs.
The four basic kind of evaluation: clinical reviews, clinical trials, program reviews, and program trials. A systematic method for collecting, analyzing, and utilizing data to check the effectiveness and efficiency of programs and, as important, to contribute to continuous program improvement.
Evaluation offers the information necessary to check how well a program or initiative is being implemented and know whether that program is achieving desired results.
To know more about process evaluations visit the link
brainly.com/question/14084377
#SPJ4
