All categories

3 years ago

Recommend four ways to deal with complainer in the work place

1 answer:

4 0

There can be a lot of ways. But here are 4 of it.
- Talk to the person and try to compromise to his complains.
- Give him or her the chance to hold accountability.
- Boost his or her confidence to be able to stand up next time on his own.
- Do not be too much available for them to depend.

You might be interested in

Sam Burke, CPA, finds a material error in his client's previously filed tax return and advises the client on how to correct it.

Anton [14]

Answer:

The answer is: C) Consider his continued association with the client.

Explanation:

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issues a professional conduct code that regulates their affiliates' activities. According to AICPA's Responsibilities and Public Interest principles, Sam should not continue to work with this client. Sam cannot maintain a professional conduct if he accepts that his client doesn't correct his prior mistakes. If those prior errors persist, then his job will be negatively affected and then it will his responsibility. Accounting is not something static that begins and ends in one period, past records affect present and future records.

5 0

3 years ago

When interacting with a customer who has a rational style and keeps communication brief, your best strategy is to

kakasveta [241]

The best strategy which a person should use when interacting with a customer who has a rational style and keeps communication brief is:

Ask open-ended questions to obtain information.

<h3>What is Communication?</h3>

This refers to the exchange of information between two or more people where feedback is given through a medium.

With this in mind, we can note that because the customer has a rational style and communicates in a straightforward manner, then the best strategy would be to ask open-ended questions to obtain information.

Read more about communication here:

brainly.com/question/26152499

3 0

2 years ago

The Campbell Company is considering adding a robotic paint sprayer to its production line. The sprayer's base price $1,080,000,

Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

a. What is the Year 0 net cash flow?

= $1,102,500 + $15,500 = $1,118,000

b. What are the net operating cash flows in Years 1, 2, 3?

NCF Year 1 = $375,496.38
NCF Year 2 = $418,521.44
NCF Year 3 = $304,148.09

c. What is the additional Year 3-cash flow (i.e. after tax salvage and the return of working capital)?

$355,433.10

d. If the project's cost of capital is 12%, should the machine be purchased?

NPV = $20,384.22 since it is positive, then the project should be carried out and the machine should be purchased.

Explanation:

book value of the robotic sprayer = $1,080,000 + $22,500 = $1,102,500

useful life 3 years, salvage value $605,000

MACRS 3-year class:

0.333 x $1,102,500 = $367,132.50

0.4445 x $1,102,500 = $490,061.25

0.1481 x $1,102,500 = $163,280.25

requires an additional $15,500 investment in inventory

saves $380,000 per year

marginal tax rate 35%

net cash flow year 1 = [net savings x (1 - tax rate)] + (depreciation expense x tax rate) = ($380,000 x 65%) + ($367,132.50 x 35%) = $247,000 + $128,496.38 = $375,496.38

net cash flow year 2 = [net savings x (1 - tax rate)] + (depreciation expense x tax rate) = ($380,000 x 65%) + ($490,061.25 x 35%) = $247,000 + $171,521.44 = $418,521.44

net cash flow year 3 = [net savings x (1 - tax rate)] + (depreciation expense x tax rate) = ($380,000 x 65%) + ($163,280.25 x 35%) = $247,000 + $57,148.09 = $304,148.09

terminal cash flow = [sales price - (purchase cost - accumulated depreciation)] x (1 - tax rate) + recovered net working capital = [$605,000 - ($1,102,500 - $1,020,474)] x 0.65 + $15,500 = $355,433.10

using an excel spreadsheet I calculated the NPV:

Year 0 -$1,118,000

Year 1 $375,496.38

Year 2 $418,521.44

Year 3 $304,148.09 + $355,433.10 = $659,581.19

discount rate 12%

NPV = $20,384.22

4 0

3 years ago

You have the following information for Oriole Company for the month ended October 31, 2022. Oriole uses a periodic method for in

Arisa [49]

Answer:

Oct. 1 Beginning inventory 55 26 = $1,430

Oct. 9 Purchase 130 28 = $3,640

Oct. 17 Purchase 95 29 = $2,755

Oct. 25 Purchase 65 31 = $2,015

totals 345 units, $28.522 per unit, $9,840

a) $28.522 per unit

b) FIFO

COGS = (55 x $26) + (130 x $28) + (70 x $29) = $7,100

Ending inventory = $2,740

Gross profit = (95 x $45) + (55 x $50) + (105 x $50) - $7,100 = $5,175

LIFO

COGS = (65 x $31) + (95 x $29) + (95 x $28) = $7,430

Ending inventory = $2,410

Gross profit = (95 x $45) + (55 x $50) + (105 x $50) - $7,430 = $4,845

Average cost

COGS = 255 x $28.522 = $7,273

Ending inventory = $2,567

Gross profit = $5,002

c) gross profit margin

FIFO = $7,100 / $12,275 = 57.8%

LIFO = $7,430 / $12,275 = 60.5%

Average = $7,273 / $12,275 = 59.3%

6 0

3 years ago

Amend Inc. debited Accounts Receivable and credited Allowance for Doubtful Accounts to reestablish an account previously written

Aleks [24]

Answer:

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and

Bad debt expense

(to fill the gaps)

Explanation:

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts is the account used to record receivables that may not be collectible. When receivables may be incollectible, the entries posted are

Debit Bad debt expense

Credit Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

When the receivables can no longer be collected

Debit Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Credit Account receivables

Hence for Amend Inc, the reversals of the above entries is what is required. Since Amend Inc. has debited Accounts Receivable and credited Allowance for Doubtful Accounts to reestablish an account previously written off, the second set of entries required would be

Debit Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Credit Bad debt expense

3 0

3 years ago