<span>You cannot effectively make a contract for an illegal act, but there are activities within the black market structure that are likely legal — say delivering goods to a location, without reference to how they are later sold.</span>
Answer:
to confirm preexisting beliefs
Explanation:
Confirmation bias
This is simply one's ability to seek, interpret, favor and recall information that is in line or conforms to an individual's pre-existing beliefs or expectations.
People here tends to likely view things that could conforms to something rather than disconfirm it.
Two reasons for the existence of onfirmation bias:
1. Directional motives: humans usually finds informations that is in line with our beliefs and expectations
2. Cognitive heuristics: It deals with things that views our beliefs and expectations usually we imagine first.
Discovery statements are used to alter course, this statement is false.
<h3>
What is Discovery? </h3>
In common law jurisdictions, discovery is the pre-trial stage of a lawsuit during which each party can obtain evidence from the other party or parties through the use of discovery tools like interrogatories, requests for the production of documents, requests for admissions, and depositions.
The early equitable pleading process before the English Court of Chancery had a distinctive characteristic that led to the development of discovery: among other requirements, a plaintiff's bill in equity had to plead "positions." These were assertions of evidence that the plaintiff believed to be true in support of his pleading and that the defendant knew about.
The availability of discovery in equity attracted plaintiffs in legal cases even though it did not exist in common law (legal proceedings in the common law courts). They started submitting bills in equity to acquire discovery in support of legal actions. The law to perpetuate the testimony of a possible witness was born as a result of this in the middle of the 15th century.
To learn more about Discovery follow the link.
brainly.com/question/28338261
#SPJ1
Perrow (1972) stated that in order for bureaucracy to be efficient, it must be "<u>stable</u>".
Perrow (1972) has gone significantly further, proposing that "the transgressions for the most part credited to organization are either not sins at all or are results of the inability to bureaucratize adequately". Then again, Perrow additionally recognizes that the "perfect" type of an organization is never figured it out. One reason for this is individuals from the association "track a wide range of mud from whatever remains of their lives with them into the association, and they have a wide range of interests that are free of the association".
