Answer:
Being self-sufficient dramatically reduces one's standard of living.
Explanation:
Thoreau had a view that one should go into the woods, live simply and produce what you need with your own hands (be self-sufficient).
Economists explain why most people in the United States do not do this. To an economist everyone in society have their own specialisation. That is why they emphasize division of labour.
So going into the woods to be self-sufficient is not the best use of one's resources and abilities.
Everyone has something unique to contribute in an interaction. What I have comparative advantage producing will be difficult for another person.
This will create a network of people giving what they have comparative advantage producing in exchange for goods and services they do not have competitive advantage producing. This results in everyone maximising utility.
But Thoreau's view will not maximise utility because it is not possible you have advantage producing all you need.
It is to be noted that the current rates of extinction as relates to certain animals and plants species show the rates to be higher than the mass extinctions at the end of the Cretaceous Period.
<h3>What is the rate of extinction?</h3>
Rates of extinction simply refer to how quickly species are becoming non-existent.
The rates are said to be on the average of 100 E/MSY. In 2020 for instance about 15 species (according to IUC) were declared extinct.
E/MSY is Extinctions per Million Species-Years. The correct answer, thus, is C.
See the link below for more about rates of extinction:
brainly.com/question/17525293
The penalty in that case was just around $4 million.
$4 mil/$43 mil = .093 %
Answer:
Hi
It meant a political situation among the states in which none of them achieved a power superior to the others. It is an idea of the late Middle Ages, applied to major or minor geographic regions that comprise the plurality of sovereign territories. Throughout Europe there is a legitimate feeling, always subject to interpretation, whereby any action required the confirmation of the rest of the States, the most significant case being the invasion of a territory. In this way the doctrine of just war was reached, to the problem of to what extent and to what extent the actual or imminent engraving of a State could mean a warlike justification. Transactions between contestants, neutral or rival, never ended, hence the relevance of diplomacy, as the concepts of balance, neutrality, freedom of Europe or sovereignty are interpreted continuously, while being used in conversations. Some thought of equilibrium as a natural system, because it was a consequence of international relations, and when a great power had too much force it threatened the others, and therefore, had to counteract the disproportion. Others considered it a desired goal for which he had fought.
In the rest of the world this balance of powers is characterized by the profusion of dictatorial or authoritarian regimes that have dominated the political scene and that have influenced the future of their peoples. A second point is the emergence of serious and bloody war conflicts, by territorial issues, which is not explained very well both in its unleashing and in its results, as consequences of the mere quantification of the powers faced. In all these, both in its gestation and its consequences, the role it plays in the character, personal ambitions and strategic conceptions of the leaders or rulers who govern the destinies of the countries involved appears with particular relevance.
Explanation:
I guess the correct option is D.
The primary purpose of patents and copyrights is to encourage the expenditure of funds on research and development to create new products.
