Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
The answer to your question is the Taj Mahal.
Gobi Desert is the answer
29 is the answer you are welcomed call when you need help
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Potential presidential candidates form exploratory committees.
Explanation:
An exploratory committee is an organization in American politics that aims to determine whether a candidate should participate in elections or elections to a political function, such as that of the President of the United States.
Under this organizational form, a candidate is allowed to raise funds without complying with the strict rules that apply to official candidates. An exploratory committee must be registered with the Federal Election Committee, which supervises campaign funding.
