When studying cause and effect, historians usually group the causes into different categories. For example, <u>cultural causes</u> reflect how a society’s literature and art convey the way the society saw itself in relation to the rest of the world. Another resource that historians use to understand society is <u>pop culture</u>, which tells them the trends and ideas that are preferred by the common people. When studying cause and effect, it’s important to remember <u>multiple causation</u>, or the idea that an effect could have several causes and vice versa.
The correct option is “cultural causes” since art and literature are related to the culture of a place. Culture is determined by literature, art, music.
The correct option is “pop culture” since it reflects the likes and ideas of common people whereas the rest of the options do not focus on common people.
The correct option is “multiple causation” since it refers to the idea that events are caused by multiple reasons, not just a single one.
<em>Huguenots would find a welcome and prosperous trade network along the lengths of </em><em>the Rodano river.</em><em> </em>
The Huguenots were groups of Calvinist Protestants who lived in the area currently shared by France and Switzerland on the banks of the Rhone River, which was the main commercial route between southern and northern Europe. Both trade and ideas flowed rapidly in the reformist era.
In times of the Roman Empire, important civil works were made such as ports, canalizations, bridges, connections between different rivers, etc., to enhance the commercial deployment between the countries of the Mediterranean coasts, the Central European regions such as Switzerland, and those of northern Europe as Germany, the Netherlands and even England crossing the channel of the spot.
The Huguenots were persecuted in France by the State and the Catholic Church and many of them (some 200,000) emigrated to other European countries such as the Netherlands, England and Germany. They also emigrated to the British colonies of the United States as active promoters of American emancipation and pioneers in deploying liberal ideas in the United States. They founded some ephemeral colonies in Florida, but did not participate in the colonization of the Mississippi River because these territories were dominated by the official French power from which they had fled.
Answer:
take good notes using Colin's and other punctuation homie
The Whigs faced a different scenario. The victory of James K. Polk (Democrat) over Henry Clay (Whig) in the 1844 presidential election had caught the southern Whigs by surprise. The key element of this defeat, which carried over into the congressional and local races in 1845 and 1846 throughout the South, was the party's failure to take a strong stand favoring Texas annexation. Southern Whigs were reluctant to repeat their mistakes on Texas, but, at the same time, Whigs from both sections realized that victory and territorial acquisition would again bring out the issue of slavery and the territories. In the South in particular, there was already the realization, or perhaps fear, that the old economic issues that had defined the Second Party System<span> were already dead. Their political goal was to avoid any sectional debate over slavery which would expose the sectional divisions within the party.</span>After an earlier attempt to acquire Texas by treaty had failed to receive the necessary two-thirds approval of the Senate, the United States annexed the Republic of Texas by a joint resolution of Congress that required simply a majority vote in each house of Congress. President John Tyler signed the bill on March 1, 1845, a few days before his term ended. As many expected, the annexation led to war with Mexico. After the capture of New Mexico and California in the first phases of the war, the political focus shifted to how much territory would be acquired from Mexico. The key to this was the determination of the future status of slavery in any new territory.
Both major political parties had labored long to keep divisive slavery issues out of national politics. The Democrats had generally been successful in portraying those within their party attempting to push a purely sectional issue as extremists that were well outside the normal scope of traditional politics.[2] However, midway through Polk's term, Democratic dissatisfaction with the administration was growing within the Martin Van Buren, or Barnburner, wing of the Democratic Party over other issues. Many felt that Van Buren had been unfairly denied the party's nomination in 1844 when southern delegates resurrected a convention rule, last used in 1832, requiring that the nominee had to receive two-thirds of the delegate votes. Many in the North were also upset with the Walker tariff which reduced the tariff rates; others were opposed to Polk's veto of a popular river and harbor improvements bill, and still others were upset over the Oregon settlement with Great Britain where it appeared that Polk did not pursue the northern territory with the same vigor he used to acquire Texas. Polk was seen more and more as enforcing strict party loyalty primarily to serve southern interests. Hope This Helps! Can I have Brainliest? Please:)
