I need help please ..
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer:
Tina would save the same amount using either option after 20 months.
With either option, Tina would save $700.
Step-by-step explanation:
This problem can be modeled by a first order equation:
Where Tina's saved money after n months is:
S(n) = S(0) + rn, where S(0) is the money put away initially and r is how much she saves every month.
The first option is to put $500 away initially and save $10 every month, so:
The second option is to put $100 away initially and save $30 every month, so:
After how many months would Tina save the same amount using either option?
It will happen at the month n in which , so:
500 + 10n = 100 + 30n
500 - 100 = 30 - 10n
400 = 20n
20n = 400
n = 20.
Tina would save the same amount using either option after 20 months.
How much would she save with either option?
We can choose or
, since they are equal
With either option, Tina would save $700.