Answer:
the facial feedback effect
Explanation:
The facial feedback effect refers to the impact of facial expressions on the emotional state of the individual. Also, forced expressions tend to make people more uncomfortable and unhappy even if they are being forced to smile like on social gatherings. Here, it is said that 'most recent participants reported feeling more happy than sad after rubberbands secured to the sides of their faces were stretched over the tops of their heads'. Hence, this is clearly the facial feedback effect as it highlights the impact of facial expressions on the emotional state of the participants.
Analyzing this example using a Gestalt perceptual principle, the noisy environment is an example of ground and his teacher's voice is an example of figure.
<h3>Ground and figure in Gestalt principle</h3>
According to the Gestalt perceptual principle, we can select what to focus on in a way that makes it seem that things, people, or other stimuli are in the background or in the foreground.
In the case described in the question, William is focusing on the teacher's voice, which means he perceives it as the figure or the foreground. On the other hand, William is tuning out the noisy environment, which means he perceives it as the background or simply ground.
Learn more about Gestalt here:
brainly.com/question/1383673
#SPJ12
You should just keep in touch with your friends, and set a date to meet them and talk to them so you can catch up.
Answer:
A community living near this area was likely to have ascribed the characteristic of intelligence to someone who was skilled at catching seals, fish and small game.
Explanation:
Howard Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligence centers on the idea that there is <em>more than one type of intelligence</em>, that these intelligences develop from various skills.
These are:
- Visual-spatial
- Linguistic-verbal
- Logical-mathematical
- Interpersonal
- Intrapersonal
- Bodily-kinesthetic
- Musical
- Naturalistic
From this approach, we can conclude that this community, which did not have any contact with other societies, and lived near the Arctic Circle, likely ascribed the intelligence characteristics to someone who had skills at getting food.
This would most likely refer to the naturalistic intelligence because in this society and in that time, that was what could be most valued since it was the basis for everyone's survival.
The answer is that "the given statement is true".
Hypocritical leadership, is when administration says a certain something, yet does another. It is when top administration admonishes the association to carry on in one way, however they keep on behaving in another.Trust is vital for any association including the leader ones. Shockingly, this trust is lost in numerous associations, according to my opinion this is hypocritical leadership.