Answer:
False
Explanation:
Customer review also called customer feedback form is an input for a company, as this acts as an input for maintaining and meeting the standards of performance.
With the help of customer feedback the organization can ensure the performance, and can work on the weaker sections in the performance, for which users have complaint.
Thus, in the given instance also, the survey information is a form of input.
Thus, the above statement in question is
False
Answer:
I wouldn't invest.
Risk preference at least 50-50 chance of gain and loose
Explanation:
case of success the return i get is $40000
case of failure i lose $20000.
My analysis shows P40=0.3 of success
And P-20=0.7 of failure.
The probability of a loose is much bigger than the probability of a gain.
So I can't bear the loose of loosing 7 times if about 20000 and gaining 3 times of about 40000 it doesn't balance.
My loose accumulating to 140000
While my gain is 120000.
I can't invest
Answer:
<h2>
$13,070
</h2>
Explanation:
The Cost of inventory = all cost of purchase; including costs of conversion and transfer.
Calculation of Inventory Cost FOB ship.
Cost of Purchase $12,000
Transportation-in $100
Shipping insurance $170
Car import duties $800
Total Cost $13,070
Answer and Explanation:
A. Given that Design 1A will cost $1.7 million to build and $175,000 per year to maintain
Given that Design 1B will cost $3.6 million to build and $40,000 per year to maintain
Both designs are assumed to be permanent
To find ROR using AW based rate of return equation, we find present value of each design and equate them:
Each design is permanent so
Present value of perpetuity:
Design 1A= 1700000+175000/r
Design 1B = 3600000+40000/r
=1700000+175000/r=3600000+40000/r
135000/r=1900000
Cross multiply
r=135000/1900000
r= 0.0710
r=7.10%
B Given that ROR=7.10% and MARR is 25%
MARR>ROR
Hence we reject both designs
Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
