Answer:
$52,000 is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
<u>Part a: What will be the equilabrium price that Dumphy and Funke will charge?</u>
Answer: Price charged = $30
<u>Part b: What are the profits for Dumphy and Funke at the equilibrium price?</u>
Answer: Profit on equilibrium price = $0
<u>Part c: What type of competition would Funke and Dumphy likely engage in after the decrease in demand?</u>
Answer: Price competition
Explanation:
<u>Part a: What will be the equilabrium price that Dumphy and Funke will charge?</u>
Answer:
Price charged by each of the artists will be equal to their marginal cost.
Thus, equilibrium P = MC = $30.
<u>Part b: What are the profits for Dumphy and Funke at the equilibrium price?</u>
Answer:
Equilibrium profits will be 0 at the equilibrium because price charged is equal to MC, leading to no profits.
<u>Part c: What type of competition would Funke and Dumphy likely engage in after the decrease in demand?</u>
Answer:
Price competition - as changes in price will lead to changes in demand and thus sales
The answer would be that there are few other places to purchase soda on campus; competition (or lack thereof) can play a big factor in determining price elasticity.
While nutrition information can shift consumers' preferences, we have no indication within the question of whether or not the students are well-informed of the impact of their drinking choices.
As for the third option, we are not given any information on the students' budgets, and no information with which to infer this, either. We only have information on their spending as it is related to soda, not as compared to other purchases.
Finally, given that the quantity sold does not change much despite the change in price, we can conclude that this price curve is relatively inelastic, in which case the price elasticity of demand would be closer to zero than one. This effectively rules out the last answer.
Answer: C. optimal mix of the risk-free asset and risky asset
Explanation:
Risk aversion simply has to do with how people curtail risk and this is done through the preference for the outcomes that have low uncertainty than those that have high uncertainty.
An investor's degree of risk aversion will determine his or her optimal mix of the risk-free asset and risky asset even if they've access to the same risk-free asset and also the same investment opportunity set of risky assets.
Yes, look for help, your store getting robbed!
