In the past, learners were required to achieve at least 50% in four specific designated subjects that were the same nationwide. However, this was recently changed - the new requirements include attaining the same percentage in any four subjects that have 20 credits from a list of subjects.
This change has certain advantages and disadvantages. The advantage is that there will be more students with better percentages applying for various high education institutions as it should now be easier for them to pick subjects they are most confident in and that will be relevant for their further education. Their focus will also be on those most important subjects for them and their studies instead of on something they might not even need in their future career.
However, a disadvantage is that students might pick subjects they find easiest just to secure their place in a university. Those subjects ultimately might not provide them with needed strategies for thinking and learning that otherwise designated subjects might have. Furthermore, some higher education institutions might have their own lists of designated subjects and minimum entry requirements that might not be the same as the student's choices
Option B, D
As a result of the Great Leap Forward, there was a power shift in favor of conservative Communist leaders and industrial production decreased.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Great Leap Forward was Mao’s endeavor to modernize China’s prosperity, China ought earnings that approached America. It was noticeable that the Great Leap Forward had been a breakdown and despite Mao declared this.
He summoned on the Communist Party to carry him to responsibility for his defeats but also directed his crowd fragments to seem at themselves and their accomplishment. In portions of China, deprivation befell and some sections of China were hooked by floods this commenced to decrease production.
I believe the answer is: Power would need to be distributed to several branches of the government so that the power of one branch could be checked by the other branches,
when we separate government power like this, one branch of the government could make an intervention if the other branch is trying to do something that is unconstitutional. This would prevent the government from transforming into a tyranny, where the head could pass every legislation as he please.
Answer:
C bc it just is XD...........
<span> Pizarro seized the Inca emperor,Atahualpa,massacred the senior Inca nobility,extracted a huge ransom in gold and silver for Atahualpa,then murdered him.Pizarro then went on to conquer an effectively leaderless Inca empire.
Much the same with Cortes and the Aztecs - initially pretending to be friendly,Cortes seized the Aztec emperor,extracted a huge ransom for him before murdering him and,although forced to retreat shortly after by superior numbers,soon returned with Mexican native allies to destroy the Aztec empire and conquer it for Spain.
Cortes' conquest was much harder fought than that of Pizarro,but basically their interaction with the natives was the same - kidnap th leader,extort a ransom,kill the hostage anyway,then attack and conquer their people.</span>
