Answer:
He had great physical strength, tenacity of purpose, and an unbreakable will. He was not obstinate and would listen to advice from others, including his wives and mother. He was flexible.
Explanation:
On one end of the leadership spectrum, there is Machiavelli–conniving, ambitious and ruthless. On the other there is Cyrus the Great–humble, generous and loyal. Along this spectrum of great leaders and motivators, used so often in business books, speeches and anecdotes, there is one unmentionable: Genghis Khan. A man so evil, unwashed and bloodthirsty that he is impossible to learn from.
Thank you for posting your question here. The one result of russian leaders' resistance to change during the nineteenth century is that Russia maintained successful relations with long-time allies. I can also go with "Russia struggled to modernize". I hope the answer will help.
The answer is the elastic clause...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:)
It's D to divide the confederacy, it wa part of the anaconda plan. Step 1, blockade ports to prevent outside help. Step 2, split the south in half at the mississippi river (the battle of vicksburg was to capture a major control point of the mississippi completing step 2). Step 3, march on the capital city.
