Answer:
Decrease by $30,000
Explanation:
Cost to buy = 15,000 * $34
Cost to buy = $510,000
Note: Since Ortega is buying 15000 units at $34, the $40,000 avoidable cost on fixed manufacturing overhead is non-applicable.
Cost of making = $150,000 + $240,000 + $90,000
Cost of making = $480,000
So, if Ortega purchases the component from the supplier instead of manufacturing it, the effect on income would be decrease by $30,000 ($510,000-$480,000).
Answer:
Structural
Explanation:
It is correct to say that Tina's scenario is an example of structural unemployment, that there are structural economic changes, which can have several different reasons, in the case of the above question, the structural change was caused by a technological change that made the newspaper where Tina worked if she scanned, and Tina's skills were not sufficient to keep up with such changes, which resulted in her resignation.
This is a type of long-term unemployment, which can negatively impact a society, with a large number of people unemployed and disqualified for current job openings, to reduce this problem, it is necessary that companies invest in training programs and effective qualifications so that its employees can follow the structural changes that occurred in their jobs.
I think it’s true
(Not sure)
Answer:
56
Explanation:
The rule of 70 can be used to determine the amount of years it would take the GDP of a country to double given its growth rate
Number o year for GDP to double = 70 / growth rate of country
for country A = 70 / 5 = 14 years
for country B = 70 / 1 = 70 years
70 years - 14 years = 56 years
