Answer:
A. Profit-seeking multinational companies shift their production from countries with strong environmental standards to countries with weak standards, thus reducing their costs and increasing their profits.
D. self-sufficiency argument.
Explanation:
In the case when there is a race to the bottom scenario so it would be described that the multinational companies that are profit seeking is shifting their production from that countries who have the strong environmental standards to the weak standard countries so that the order would be decreased due to this the profit would increase
In the other case, when the nation is not too much depend on other countries for supplies so this case we called as self-sufficiency argument as they managed themselves rather depending on another
The answer that is being depicted above is red flag. This is
a process or a way of having to provide reasonable explanation or to alert an individual
when there is a problem that is present in means of having to let them know
about it.
Answer:
Net Sales $2720
Explanation:
Hancock Corporation
Jan 6: Sales $ 1500
Add Jan 6 Sales $ 850
Less Jan 14 Sales Discount $ 30 ( 2% of $ 1500)
<u>Add Feb 28: Sales $ 400</u>
<u>Net Sales $2720 </u>
Only a 2% discount is given on the cash received on Jan 14 on the sales made on JAn 6 to S. Green because the cash is received within the first ten days of sales made. The cash received on Feb 2 is not given the sales discount as it is received after ten days of the sales made. That is sales were done on Jan 6 to M. Munoz. with the terms 2/10, n/30 meaning discount will be given within the first ten days . But as the payment was on Feb 2 almost 17 days later the discount is not given.
The term 2/10 n/30 means a two percent discount will be given if sales were paid within the first ten days. So a discount is given to S. Green but not M. Munoz as payment is done after 10 days.
The answer & explanation for this question is given in the attachment below.