A. guaranty arrangement
The third party is providing a guarantee that the lender will recover the debt regardless of the borrower's reputation to pay.
Answer:B. if transaction costs are low, private bargaining will result in an efficient solution to the problem of externalities.
Explanation:
The coarse theorem:
If there is a conflict between parties this will lead to an effecient results irrespective of who won the right to the property as long as the transaction cost related to the price negotiation is insignificant.
Answer:
Total E&P = $ 160000
Total voting Right Sold = 50/ (100+100) = 25%
Reduction of E& P due to exchange = Total E&P*Total voting Right Sold
Reduction of E& P due to exchange = 160000*25%
Reduction of E& P due to exchange = 40000
Reduction of E& P Lower of Total E&P*Total voting Right Sold or Amount realised
Reduction of E& P Lower of 40000 or (50*1000)
Reduction of E& P Lower of 40000 or 50000
Answer
A reduction of $40,000 in E&P because of the exchange.
Answer:
The entry is not required because the outcome is reasonably possible, not certain or probable. So IAS 37 says that the liability must not be recognized as the outcome is not reasonably certain or probable.
Explanation:
The liability must be included in the financial statement only if the outcome is certain or probable. In this scenario, the outcome is reasonably possible but neither certain nor probable in this situation. So the entry in the financial statement is not required. If the liability is of a huge amount then IAS 37 says that their must be a disclosure in the financial statement notes about the lawsuit.
Answer:
$6,540
Explanation:
Given:
accounts receivable of $238,000
allowance for uncollectable accounts of $600 (credit)
Also, the allowance for uncollectible accounts should be 3% of accounts receivable.
Therefore the amount of the adjustment for uncollectible accounts would be
= 3% of $238,000 - $600= $(7140-600)= $6,540
