1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Irina-Kira [14]
3 years ago
11

In the prince, Machiavelli advises rulers to

History
2 answers:
creativ13 [48]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

a liar and deceiver

SSSSS [86.1K]3 years ago
3 0
Machiavelli advises the ruler to become a "great liar and deceiver", and that men are so easy to deceive, that the ruler won't have an issue with lying to others. He justifies this by saying that men are wicked, and never keep their words, therefore the ruler doesn't have to keep his.
You might be interested in
Question 14 (1 point)
Alchen [17]

The correct option is C

The Battle of Berlin was the last major battle in Europe during World War II. It began on April 16, 1945 after the start of a major offensive by the Soviet Union on the city, capital of the Third Reich, and ended on May 2, 1945, when the German defenders surrendered the city to the Red Army. Finally, at 01:00 hours on May 2, General Weidling with his staff sent a message to Soviet General Vasili Chuikov to request unconditional surrender.

8 0
4 years ago
Were the terms set forth in the treaty of Versailles justified? Was the treatment Germany received too harsh?
Ira Lisetskai [31]
The terms set forth in the Treaty of Versailles were not justified nor thought through, as they led to the harsh punishment of the losing side, which encourages revenge and the like. This is why the terms that Germany received were too harsh. The harsh treatment of Germany could lead to them seeking revenge on the winning countries, which would start another massive-scale war.
3 0
4 years ago
How did the government benefit from the Dawes Severalty Act?
34kurt

B. It gave the ability to purchase surplus lands

7 0
3 years ago
Was the First Crusade successful? How do you know?
kenny6666 [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

Was the first crusade successful?

Well, it all depends on which side we are talking about. If we are talking about the crusader's side, it was a success. Then, obviously, it was not for the Muslim side.

The first crusade was fought from 1096 to 1099. On July 14, 1099, after three years of intense combats, teh Crusaders finally captured the important city of Jerusalem, defeating the Muslim troops. After some research, some historians say that the Muslim army was not in the best shape because the Turks were already weak from fighting themselves.

4 0
3 years ago
What was the outcome of the Scopes
Ivan
I believe the answer is D.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Dred Scott v. Sanford US Supreme Court case intensify the fight for abolition?
    10·1 answer
  • What aspects of society, the culture of the people, were changed following the 1911 Revolution?
    10·1 answer
  • Why is there a conflict between Israel and Palestine? What is the origin of this conflict?
    5·1 answer
  • Plz help!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Match each enlightenment philosopher to his philosophy
    14·2 answers
  • 99 POINT QUESTION, PLUS BRAINLIEST!!!
    12·2 answers
  • What was the mlk enlightenment and how did that effect society in general?
    11·1 answer
  • Can Animals get Pneumoniaultramicroscopicsiliconevolcanoconsis?
    11·1 answer
  • What are the main reasons Europeans came to the west Indians
    13·1 answer
  • Pretend you are Virginia:
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!