The correct answer is E, that, a view of history in which the traditional interpretation is upheld best describes the Consensus historiography. The Historiography was used in reference by the U.S School of History and the movement was influential in the 1950s and 1960s.
Your answer would be A) How the slave population would be counted. During the time, there was a big debate on whether or not the slaves in the U.S should be counted towards the whole population of the United States when it comes to voting. People wanted a proper number, or representation, of the amount of people in the U.S that voted. The free men that lived in the U.S has every right to vote, but whenever a Slave votes, their votes would count as only 3/5 of a person. That's where the three-fifths compromise comes from, it decided that slaves could only be 3/5 of a person, meaning that their vote will count as 3/5, but not 1 whole. This means that the slaves who vote don't represent a whole person, and is only partially voting. This made the voting numbers very difficult and inaccurate because a person who's voting can't be only 3/5 of a person. In order for the votes to be more accurate, people believed that everyone, even slaves, should be one whole vote, not 3/5 of a vote.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The ancient China have had 2 forms government, feudatory form and monarchy form.
In the feudatory form, the center government shared rule for the government of locals, because in that time, transportation was backward, they didn’t have ability for control the locals
But when the goverment of locals have alot of powerful, they usually againsted for the rule of center government and center government don’t accept for that point, then they builded the form monarchy, in the form monarchy, the center government control all of locals
It establishes our rights, freedom, and explains the civil order of the u.s
2 European countries still held african colonies in 1914
