They were better because there was more space (it wasn't already taken by the country industrialising itself), and there was no competition from the country itself, it's like us walking into a tribe nowadays, our technology is <em>extremely</em> superior so we could waltz in if we wanted to, in so if someone expanded from a modern society into a non industrialised country it would be effortless.
They used mud, soil, and clay in their bricks
B. Oliver Cromwell led the Puritan forces against the king<span>
The English Civil War led to the rise of the Commonwealth. So option “b” is the correct option as far as the given question is concerned. This Commonwealth period started in the year 1640 and continues till 1660. During this Civil War period the authority of King Charles I was challenged by the people and this ultimately led to the execution of King Charles I. The son of Charles I again started the rule of Monarchy in the year 1660.
</span><span>They believed blacks were entitled to the same political rights and opportunities as whites. They also believed that confederate leaders should be punished for their roles in the civil war.<span>The Republican Radicals felt that extraordinary times called for direct intervention in state affairs and laws designed to protect the emancipated blacks. At the heart of their belief was the notion that blacks must be given a chance to compete in a free-labor economy. In 1866, the activist congress introduced a bill to extend the life of the Freedmen's Bureau and began work on a Civil Rights Bill.
</span></span>
Basically the south was more farmed based and as a result didn't have a lot of land that they could give up for factories and manufacturing buildings.
On the other side, the north was very industrialized and were able to produce mass goods which in return boosted their economy.