Answer: The cases in which the Review Commission renders decisions arise from inspections conducted by a Federal agency separate from the Review Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which is a part of the Department of Labor. OSHRC, or the Review Commission, and OSHA were created by the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, but the Act mandated that the Review Commission be an independent agency (i.e., not part of another Federal department) to ensure that parties to agency cases receive impartial hearings.
Explanation:
Answer:
Compounded annually:
24820 = x * (1.08^3) = 1.259712x
x = 24820/1.259712 = $19703
Compounded quarterly:
24820 = x*(1.02)^12 = 1.26824x
x = 24820/1.26824 = $19570
Explanation:
I hope you can understand better and no need for further explanation.
Answer:
Increased publicity
Explanation:
if a judge overturns a case from a trial court and rejects precedent, the judge should get publicity for her decision and modification of the precedent so that it becomes a new way or basis of judging similar cases. In other words if judge Karen decides that the precedent before her to judge the case is outdated as a result of technological changes, she will decide on the case before her based on what she believes the precedent should reflect(new technologies) and this becomes the new basis for judging all such cases and as a result should be publicised for other judges to take note
Answer:
Net present value of this expansion project is 8234.
Explanation:
To get the net present value, we make a cash-flow in excel. See document attached.
At moment 0 the investment is =$(92.700), also we consider the working capital =(6.600)
Moment 1 to 6 = $26.900
We calculate the Net cash flow (that is the difference between benefits and cost).
To get net present value, we use VNA formula. ( =VNA(required rate of return; Net cash flow from moment 0 to moment 6) +Net cash flow at moment 0)
Net present value is 8234
Answer:
210
Explanation:
- The number of race cars = N₁ = 3
- The number of gasoline brands = N₂ = 5
- The number of test sites = N₃ = 7
- The number of drivers that participated = N₄ = 2
This study must include each N₁, and it has to be done at each N₃, using each N₂, while carried out by each N₄ ⇒ that means that the total number of possibilities:
N₁ x N₃ x N₂ x N₄ = 3 x 7 x 5 x 2 = 210
The total number of test runs is 210.