Answer:
a. Income from subsidiary will be lower by the amount of the ending inventory profit multiplied by the noncontolling interest percentage for downstream transfers.
Explanation:
When we transfer inventory from subsidiary to holding there will be some profit element included in cost. so when we consolidate the account of subsidiary to its holding at the time of reporting we should removed that unrealised profit included in the inventory.
Liberal humanism is a philosophical stance that highlights the agency and value of human beings, both individually and collectively.
Answer:
Monthly savings= $3,584.42
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Ross has decided that he wants to build enough retirement wealth that, if invested at 6 percent per year, will provide him with $4,600 of monthly income for 30 years. To date, he has saved nothing, but he still has 20 years until he retires.
First, we need to find the final value.
FV= (4,600*12)*30= $1,656,000
Now, we can calculate the monthly deposit:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
Isolating A:
A= (FV*i)/{[(1+i)^n]-1}
i= 0.06/12= 0.005
n= 20*12= 240
A= (1,656,000*0.005)/[(1.005^240)-1]= 8,280/ 2.31= $3,584.42
Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.