Answer:
cross-sectional
Explanation:
Cross-sectional research: In cross-sectional research, the experimenter or the researcher examines a group of people, specific context, and a social phenomenon with the help of a sample. The cross sectional-study or research is also known as transverse study, prevalence study, etc. This is a type of an observational study, that examines a particular population data in a specific time.
Advantage:
1. Cost-effective
2. Easy to gather and assess data.
3. Less time taking.
In the give question, Dr Cross is studying the relationship between age and dependency/independence using cross-sectional research.
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, commonly referred to as the linguistic relativity hypothesis, makes the claim that how one thinks about reality depends on the language one speaks.
<h3>What is the explanation for the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?</h3>
According to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, a person's language's grammatical and more verbal structure affects how they see the outside world. It stresses how language shapes or has an impact on one's thoughts. For instance, in other languages, various words have distinct meanings.
According to the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, one's thoughts are either determined by or influenced by language. In other words, depending on the language used to describe the world, people who speak various languages have different perspectives on it.
For more information about the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/5695330
#SPJ1
Answer:
Temperament
Explanation:
Temperament can be explained or described as a part or aspect of personality that is concerned with emotional disposition or response. This means that , temperament is the type of emotion or behavior an individual tends to exhibit.
It has been discovered that temperament is biologically based, this means that , it is inborn and does not developed. This is why it can be discovered or noticed even right from birth.
In the case of Sarah children, their differences are due to their temperament. This because temperament is differences in individuals.
<span>5
You want to meet at least one American and one Canadian. When you meet the 1st person, that person will be either an American, or a Canadian and you've satisfied half of your requirement. Let's assume the person you meet is a Canadian. That leaves you 7 people you haven't met yet, 3 Canadians and 4 Americans. You meet the 2nd person, but were unlucky and it's another Canadian. There's now 6 people left, 2 Canadians, 4 Americans. So you meet a 3rd and were unlucky again. So there's 5 people left. 1 Canadian, 4 Americans. You meet a 4th person and you managed to grab a Canadian again. You now have 4 people yet to meet, and they're all Americans. So you meet the 5th person and since there are only Americans left, you finally manage to meet an American. The exact same logic applies if the 1st person you meet happens to be an American and your next 3 choices are also Americans. In order to be absolutely certain of meeting at least one American and one Canadian is to pick n+1 people where n is the larger number of the two groups. And in this problem. n = max(number of Americans, number of Canadians).</span>
