Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
I am not 100% sure. But I do know the answer are not 2 and 3 are wrong. Hope that helps.
<span>The Hagia Sofia's design is grand and very large. This reflects the church in that religion is a big imposing force in people's lives, as the building is physically. The intricate design of the art is successful in drawing in people and also showing the grandness of the church. This also plays into Justinian's position in society. He wanted to be seen as a strong force overseeing everything, and having such a large, imposing building to his name helps emphasize that position. In the times of Byzantine architecture, the ruler gained a lot of their power from their believed connection to God. Because of this, Byzantine architecture about God, but in doing so was also about the ruler by extension.</span>
They disregard them by comparing one black slave to only 3/5 of a human. it demoralized them bc liberty means freedom but they were slaves, equality is automatically thrown out bc they are only 3/5 of a white man. and self governing is no bc they were forced to do things such as cultivating cotton without their own consent per se
