1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
solmaris [256]
2 years ago
15

What reasons could Lincoln have for making such a move during the Civil war?

History
1 answer:
Alex17521 [72]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1. Because keeping slaves goes against God's word

2. Keeping slaves goes against the declaration of independence. - All Men are Created Equal

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is the relationship between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution? *
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

The Declaration of Independence, which officially broke all political ties between the American colonies and Great Britain, set forth the ideas and principles behind a just and fair government, and the Constitution outlined how this government would function.Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What was the purpose of president john f. kennedys flexible response defense policy?
drek231 [11]

The Flexible response was a policy implemented by President John F. Kennedy in 1961 in order to substitute the New Look and the massive retaliation policy that Dwight Eisenhower's had introduced, which consisted on responding using a greater force in case of an attack, and such force involved nuclear weapons.  

On the other hand, the flexible response policy aknowledges the Mutual assured destruction if nuclear weapons are involved, as the enemy with shoot back too. It aimed to provide a manner of responding to agression across the spectrum of war but without the employment of nuclear weapons.


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the meaning of patronage
larisa86 [58]
The power to control appointments to office or the right to privileges
hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When should scientific claims be questioned?
rusak2 [61]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Small sample size may not accurately represent the truth of the experiment. These experiments should questioned, challenged, and performed again with a larger sample size.

7 0
2 years ago
Where did the Romans get the money to build a new navy? What might this say about the strength of the Roman Republic?
Roman55 [17]

It took two men to wrestle Rome back from chaos and turn a republic into an empire. In the first century BC, Rome was a republic. Power lay in the hands of the Senate, elected by Roman citizens. But the senators were fighting for power between themselves.

'fleet') comprised the naval forces of the ancient Roman state. ... Because of that, the navy was never completely embraced by the Roman state, and deemed somewhat "un-Roman". In antiquity, navies and trading fleets did not have the logistical autonomy that modern ships and fleets possess.

Many of the achievements of the ancient Romans are still in use today. The Roman Empire was powerful, due to its strong military tactics. Roman military policies helped to expand the empire. The soldiers were trained in the latest tactics of war and were well equipped with the weapons of war.

Who were the top government officials in the Roman Republic and what were their duties? Consuls. There were 2 consuls and they headed the army and ran the government. They also kept each other in line because each could veto the other's decision.

It took two men to wrestle Rome back from chaos and turn a republic into an empire. In the first century BC, Rome was a republic. Power lay in the hands of the Senate, elected by Roman citizens. But the senators were fighting for power between themselves.

Invasions by Barbarian tribes. The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders.

'fleet') comprised the naval forces of the ancient Roman state. ... Because of that, the navy was never completely embraced by the Roman state, and deemed somewhat "un-Roman". In antiquity, navies and trading fleets did not have the logistical autonomy that modern ships and fleets possess.

hope this helps

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The most dramatic spy case to come before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) involved the
    14·1 answer
  • The ten basic rights contained in the Bill of Rights belong to every American. True False
    13·1 answer
  • Who entered the presidential election of 1968 as a third-party candidate?
    6·2 answers
  • When too much water is taken out of aquifers, faster than can be recharged it is called ?
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the difference between a nation-state
    12·1 answer
  • Of his estimated
    12·1 answer
  • The countries highlighted below in yellow were part of which alliance during world war i?
    5·1 answer
  • Select all that apply.
    6·2 answers
  • Which was not a major accomplishment of byzantine culture?​
    12·2 answers
  • Read the passages below and answer the questions based on what you have read.
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!