Explanation:
translation = Why are religious and moral norms not coercible?
The relationship between religion and morality has long been hotly debated. Does religion make us more moral? Is it necessary for morality? Do moral inclinations emerge independently of religious intuitions? These debates, which nowadays rumble on in scientific journals as well as in public life, have frequently been marred by a series of conceptual confusions and limitations. Many scientific investigations have failed to decompose “religion” and “morality” into theoretically grounded elements; have adopted parochial conceptions of key concepts—in particular, sanitized conceptions of “prosocial” behavior; and have neglected to consider the complex interplay between cognition and culture. We argue that to make progress, the categories “religion” and “morality” must be fractionated into a set of biologically and psychologically cogent traits, revealing the cognitive foundations that shape and constrain relevant cultural variants. We adopt this fractionating strategy, setting out an encompassing evolutionary framework within which to situate and evaluate relevant evidence. Our goals are twofold: to produce a detailed picture of the current state of the field, and to provide a road map for future research on the relationship between religion and morality.
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, commonly referred to as the linguistic relativity hypothesis, makes the claim that how one thinks about reality depends on the language one speaks.
<h3>What is the explanation for the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?</h3>
According to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, a person's language's grammatical and more verbal structure affects how they see the outside world. It stresses how language shapes or has an impact on one's thoughts. For instance, in other languages, various words have distinct meanings.
According to the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, one's thoughts are either determined by or influenced by language. In other words, depending on the language used to describe the world, people who speak various languages have different perspectives on it.
For more information about the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/5695330
#SPJ1
Many honor societies offer exclusive benefits to their members, including access to job banks, scholarships and study abroad opportunities. Many honor societies also offer lifetime membership, which often includes permanent access to job banks and other member benefits. The first thing you will do as a member of the National Honor Society is attend the local induction ceremony with your high school peers. ... NHS members are also invited to exclusive leadership events such as state summits, national leadership conferences, and more,
Answer: Speaking in tongues
Explanation: Ecstatic religious experiences in some religious communities are associated with transcendental states in which members of such religions receive spiritual experience. During a trance inspired by a spirit or spirits, they can speak different languages even though they had never learned those languages before and knew nothing about them. The explanation is that during religious trans experiences, some spirit-taught members began to speak languages. There is an example of this in the Bible, when, after the ascension of Christ to heaven, or more precisely in the fiftieth day after Christ's resurrection, the Holy Spirit descended on the apostles, and they began to speak different languages in order to preach Christ's teaching to different nations.
<span>He or she is following the maturational theory of child development. This was created by Dr. Arnold Gesell and focuses on the normal growth expectations in children. It studies the course, the pattern, and the rate of this maturation as well.</span>
