In this scenario, we have committed an error related to Procedural justice
Procedural justice refers to way of ensuring fair justice by making decisions according to fair processes to ensure fair treatment.
According to this justice rule, the same rule must be applied to similar scenario and must be impartial as well in order to ensure fair justice.
In conclusion, we have committed an error relating to procedural justice because the rule that was <em>applied to Julio </em>was <em>not applied to John</em>, therefore, there was a bias in justice.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/10925598</em>
Question Completion with Options:
2.5 percentage points
1.5 percentage points
3.5 percentage points
6.5 percentage points
Answer:
Sandra's creditor must determine if the APR for the loan exceeds the average prime offer rate by:
1.5 percentage points
Explanation:
The first mortgage loan principal should not exceed the conforming loan limit for the area where Sandra lives at the time that she secures the loan approval. It behooves on Sandra’s creditor to determine if the annual percentage rate (APR) for the mortgage loan exceeds the average prime offer rate (or the sample rate that is a representative of the APRs charged by creditors for mortgage loans that have low-risk pricing characteristics) by 1.5 percentage points.
Answer:
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
Sophie is willing to sell a textbook for $30, while Ruby is willing to purchase it for $60. Both negotiate and agree on a price of $45.
The gain for Sophie will be the difference between the minimum price she was expecting and the price she gets for the textbook.
Gain for Sophie
= $45 - $30
= $15
The gain for Ruby will be the difference between the maximum price she was willing to pay and the price she actually paid.
Gain for Ruby
= $60 - $45
= $15
So, both of them have a gain of $15 from trade.