Answer:
E and F.
Explanation:
The author’s primary purpose to educate children is shown in the last options as you fully underestand the tale.
"That is the very reason why we are so cautious; for if you yesterday treated us better than the Goats you have had so long, it is plain also that if others came after us, you would in the same manner prefer them to ourselves.”
It's simmilar to a fable in which you get a moral answer, a teaching of some sort. In this case, it would roughly be: "Treat everyone the same way" or the other way around: "Don't trust those who treat you better by treating anyone else wrong".
I'd choose option E because it's the moment when you start entering a cathartical moment, very useful when teaching things to children.
Nick makes a good narrator
because he tends to be the unbiased party. He can be considered reliable
because many of the character choose to trust him. He also depicts a character
of a well-educated and honest narrator. He is an average person, which allow
him to make connections with the audience. Just like one of lines in the story
where he said, “You see I usually find myself among strangers because I drift
here and there trying to forget the sad thing that happened to me.”,
which is a familiar experience in true-life. On the other hand, he is an unreliable
narrator because of the fact that, even though he claims to be non-judgmental,
he lets his judgments of people be swayed by his own standards and expectations
and misstate his descriptions.
Answer:
Your answer would be D.
Explanation:
The sentence that contains a dangling modifier is D. A dangling modifier is a word or phrase that modifies a word not clearly stated in the sentence. In the sentence above, "preparing for the experiment" is a present participle expressing an action but does not name the doer of the action. In English sentences, the doer of the action must be the subject of the main sentence. However, the doer of the action is not "several slides" (the subject of the main clause). Slides do not have volition, so they can't prepare an experiment.
As the doer of the action is not clearly stated, the participle phrase is said to be dangling. Consequently, you should name the appropriate or logical doer of the action as the subject of the main clause. In this case, it could be an NP such as "the scientist" or you can turn the whole sentence into a when clause --> When the scientist was preparing the experiment, several slides...
I think its a hypothesis because a hypothesis predicts whts gonna happen nxt but may not b always tru
Situational Irony is correct
