<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the Prime Minister is the head of Parliament, and can rally the most support from other members when it comes to legislation. Technically, he still has to answer to the King or Queen, however.</span></span>
<span>Catherine de Medici brought Haute to France in the 17th century. Haute is luxury or gourmet cuisine. It is typically served hot and paired with an expensive wine, as well. When it was first brought to France, only the elite could afford the food.</span>
Answer:
a) Identify ONE way that internal tension led China to become communist.
China had a civil war between the nationalists and the communists, and the communists were victorious, so we can say that China became communist directly as a result of the previous internal tension. This is a historical fact.
b) Identify ONE way that Japanese aggression contributed to China’s conversion to communism.
Japanese aggression and colonial adventure in China was extremely cruel to the Chinese people, and China felt humilliated during this time. This created the enviroment for the seeking of radical change and solutions, and this is precisely what communism offered at the time.
c) Explain ONE way that the Great Leap Forward affected Chinese citizens
The Great Leap Forward was a massive disaster. The worst outcome of this policy was the famine that killed tens of millions of Chinese. The famine occured due to misguided agricultural policies that led to insufficient harvests.
Assuming you're pro-Columbus day, these are points that can be made:
Being historically accurate, Columbus day should be celebrated because he attempted and was successful at colonizing and helping America grow.
A common argument trying to counter being pro-Columbus day is the mention of killing Native Americans, so you can mention that diseases had already existed and were the primary cause of death in the New Land rather than Natives being killed (keep in mind though that disease and murder were both factors).
Another Pro argument that could be made is the fact that yes, vikings DID find America first, however Columbus helped Americas economy, etc.
Assuming you're anti-Columbus day, these are more points:
What Christopher Columbus did to Native Americans is unjust, essentially he took land from the Natives and they were forced to convert and change their lifestyle in order to work with Columbus or were killed; brutality is unacceptable.
The day itself should be focused on the Native American victims of Columbus.
The vikings technically found the New Land.
I hope this helped a little! :)
Answer:
1. How are patrician and lower class families similar?)) The patricians were any member of a group of citizen families who formed a privileged class in early Rome. The patricians were the wealthy upper class, who owned land and held political power. The plebeians were the working class without substantial wealth. (the head of the family is/were paterfamilias)
2. How are patrician girls and slaves similar/How are Roman women and plebeians similar?))
<em><u>(</u></em><em><u>(</u></em><em><u>woman</u></em><em><u>)</u></em><em><u>)</u></em><em><u> </u></em>Roman women had a very limited role in public life. They could not attend, speak in, or vote at political assemblies and they could not hold any position of political responsibility. ... Typical jobs undertaken by such women were in agriculture, markets, crafts, as midwives and as wet-nurses.
<em><u>(</u></em><em><u>(</u></em><em><u>plebe</u></em><em><u>ians</u></em><em><u>)</u></em><em><u>)</u></em> They protected some basic rights of all Roman citizens regardless of their social class. Eventually the plebeians were allowed to elect their own government officials. They elected "tribunes" who represented the plebeians and fought for their rights. They had the power to veto new laws from the Roman senate. (Roman women cannot vote, but plebeians now can. in the early stages of Roman, plebeians had very few rights aswell)
3. How does the social class impact the type of food eaten?)) In contemporary Western society, social class differences in food consumption follow a general pattern. Upper class groups consume foods that signify exclusivity and access to rare goods; while lower class groups, on the other hand, consume foods that are readily available.