<span>Are referred to as science wars. This debate emerged in the 90s about objectivity in scientific research studies. The debate arises as a criticism of various investigations, for example of cultural anthropology or feminist studies. <span>Their originality was questioned, and above all, their objectivity because they considered that the studies were based more on social constructions than on objective facts.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
Answer:
Regionalization
Explanation:
Erving Goffmam believes that humans generally in their behaviors is usually influence by their relationship and personal happening. Regionalization has to do with the breakdown of a whole unit into subunits for ease (decentralization).
Erving stated that a person always tries to create a new version of himself/ herself(an impression) of what he or she wants the other person to think of himor her during a conversation. He believes that we are like actors projecting different roles and trying to project an image to the public about us. Regionalization helps us to focus on that aspect we are good. Goffman stated that hamans generally like to project that positive part of their life they want people to see so as to quide people's opinion especially that positive angle of themselves.
Answer:
Content validity
Explanation:
Your friend, Tania, is asking your advice on her new study design. She is conducting a study on whether milk chocolate consumption prior to a memory task will improve recall performance as compared to consuming white chocolate. She decides to include three participants in each group. You tell her that she should likely have more participants or she will lack <u>content</u> validity. Content validity has to do with whether your research subjects or respondents are representative of all aspect of your research construct. Increasing the sample size or the number of replicates per treatment increases the construct validity by increasing the degree of freedom and reducing experimental error. Increasing the sample size will make the study a more representation of the entire study population.
I would assume that this is a multiple choices question, thus the answer would be letter the first statement after the claim. "because human behavior may be patterned, but it is also spontaneous". Creating a central dogma in sociology would be like creating a central dogma of explaining humanity. As there are always the spontaneous nature of humanity, making prediction out of patterned behavior could be flawed. <span />
Answer:
informational social influence
Explanation:
The term social influence is defined as the process when an individual's behavior is being influenced or directed due to imagined or real presence of other person.
Informational social influence: The term informational social influence refers to the process when an individual conforms with the other person to acquire knowledge and due to the fact that he or she thinks that the other person is right or other person's opinions is correct.
In the question above, the given statement is an example of informational social influence.
